1. Thats all I need, cause its the truth.
  2. the negative being that voter intimidation didnt happen?

    usually to win a case they have to prove a positive (like voter intimidation did happen)
  3. How on God's green earth could an anonymous character on a message board be a coward? What am I afraid of? Okie? Quit beating around the bush...sorry, Spain just scored...and say what's on your mind.
  4. you coonass
  5. Damn. That's low.
  6. thats what you persona displays, other than that, you would have to answer that question on why you're a coward, instead of trying to change the meaning of your little racial insults. So stop being a puzzy and stop denying what you really meant and what you really are. Its not the fact of what you said, that didnt set me off at all. Its the fact that you are actually stupid enough to try to change the meaning or act like you meant something else.

    Just like Twisted's explanation of the word cracker, the same is known with the phrase Angry Black Man and Clever comparison...

    Angry black man syndrome


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eldridge_Cleaver

    So own up to it and stop being a coward. Yes I compared you to David Duke after you said these things about me.
  7. There was 1st person testimony from people saying the black dude with the night stick was being intimidating.
  8. thats not what the conservative journalist wrote.

    "no one has produced actual evidence that any voters were too scared to cast their ballots"
  9. They don't have to prove that:

    Campaign Legal Center blog: Rattling the Vote Cage - Part I