WMD honcho reportedly quitting

i use that bottled water. its called "shop sweat". like all people who sometimes vote republican, i love to take advantage of the little guy. i barely have time enough for that though, i spend most of my time oppressing various minorities and lying about oil related government coverups for my cronies.

 

Actually what comes out of your ass probably makes more sense.

For the hundredth time, the UN OPPOSED the invasion and conquest of Iraq.

When you come up with something new, get back to me. Otherwise don't waste my time.

 

i just pointed out that i was quoting bush, and not the UN. i remain aware that the UN opposed war. i am not exaggerating even slightly when i say this is the 7th or 8th time i have told you this.

i will explain this to you again. you originally asked for "real" reasons for going to war. i gave you many reasons, most of which were quotes from george bush in a speech he gave to the UN. you misunderstood me and wanted to say i was claiming the UN endorsed the war, which i did not say. i was giving you the legitimate reasons for war, as stated by bush. because it happened that the reasons for war i gave were in a speech at the UN, you were confused and thought i was claiming the UN favored the war, which they did not.

you proceeded to categorize me as a right wing bush loving liar. thats silly because i oppose bush in so many ways. for instance, i think all religions are stupid, i love abortion and i love legal drugs. bush's recent trade deal is terrible. i am not a blind follower of bush. i think he is a good man, and a trustworthy man, but we dont always agree.

however, on foreign policy, you cant be a damn wuss all the time and have the respect of the world. we cant not follow through on what we say, ever. if we do not want countries to harbor terrorists, then we cannot make threats and pass resolutions and not follow through. if we say to country X "do not harbor terrorists, do not make weapons, do not murder your own people, do not invade your neighbors" we want them to know that they had better listen. we should not pussyfoot around like the UN and sit on our hands because we are so afraid of war. we ALREADY HAVE war. we cant passively sit and wait for stuff to happen. the fact is saddam hussein would pay the families of suicide bombers. they didnt happen to attack the US but i dont care. suicide bombers suck and i want everyone who supports them to be killed.

should we have cared when saddam invaded kuwait? maybe not. i didnt care. but when we decided to liberate kuwait, we could have destroyed iraq and made the world a safer place. but instead of that, we told them they better behave or else. they didnt, so we have to follow through, its that simple. read this next sentence twice : if we do not follow through, then our words become meaningless.

so dont catgorize me as a mindless and blind follower of bush. i would certainly prefer a libertarian atheist president. but i definitely would prefer bush to a whiny bitch like howard dean who is so transparently ambitious that he rides the war casualties to votes. thats the way liberals work. they are too emotional to make the right decision. they correctly surmise that war casualties suck, but mindlessly cant understand the necessity of war. they are right that it sucks that some people are poor, but foolishly think taxing the rich and giving to the poor solves problems. the liberal mind is very weak. you are too liberal.

 

quoted by Cottonbowl66
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's face reality: if no poisonous gas was found in warheads, in missiles on launchers ready to be fired on the battlefield, then Saddam never had them.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quoted by SabanFan
at least we use our mouth
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1st Cottonbowl66 is the biggest idiot I've ever seen if he believes
his statement.

2nd Ditto everyone here except Cottonbowl66

He should be worried, somethings not right with him, he's the
only one around here who believes what he says.

3rd SabanFans quote

I would say at least we use our Brain and not our mouth.

thats all cottonbowl66 uses is his mouth.

 

I removed the superfluous words leaving the gist of every one of CottonBowel's posts.

 

yeah, personal attacks are a lot more common than rational thinking.

 

Has anybody noticed that not a single one of CottonInHisEars'666's posts have gotten a single supporting post from any of the other liberals on this forum? C'mon JD, don't you have a few good words to say about your brother in liberalism?

:dis: :shock: :dis:

 

I agree with him on a lot of things - just not the war (a couple of aspects of the war I agree with him on, but not the bulk).

I agree he does a lot of name calling and is bombastic, but you guys aren't exactly respectful toward him either.