Why the Heisman is a joke.

Discussion in 'OTHER SPORTS Forum' started by PodKATT, Dec 11, 2009.

  1. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    Yeah right. If Colt McCoy hadn't stunk it up against Nebraska, he would have won it. From day 1 it was a 2 man race: McCoy and Tebow. Ingram worked his way in, but nobody else had a prayer. It's a phucking joke.
     
  2. DRC

    DRC TigerNator

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    4,745
    Likes Received:
    374
    The Heisman award is one of the most prestigious awards in all of sports. It may seem like a joke but the guy who has one of these parked in his trophy case will always make a good living no matter what. Heisman trophy winners are one of the most sought after speakers on the rubber chicken circuit and at corporate events. They can work every week of the year and make six figures easy.
     
  3. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247

    The process is a joke, not the award.
     
  4. Weisguy

    Weisguy Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2009
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    6
    Suh was the most dominant player in college.

    Toby Gerhart was the best running back in college. It would take three or four players to finally take him to the ground.

    And, of course, Jimmy Clausen was the best QB in college.
     
  5. GregLSU

    GregLSU LSUFANS.com

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2007
    Messages:
    8,293
    Likes Received:
    3,798
    Geez, I wonder how Ingram was able to rise above the McCoy/Tebow show to win a heisman for something he's not in the first year of the new world.
     
  6. Contained Chaos

    Contained Chaos Don't we all?

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    9,467
    Likes Received:
    2,124
    Simply put, no one player meant more to the success of his team than Gerhart. Without Tebow, Ingram, or McCoy, those teams are still pretty good. Without Gerhart, Stanford is the PAC-10 cellar dweller that they usually are. The Heisman is not supposed to go to the best player on the best team, but it almost always ends up that way.
     
  7. BAY0U BENGAL

    BAY0U BENGAL I'm a Chinese Bandit

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    6,097
    Likes Received:
    2,454
    They had to give it to Ingram. Bama's never had a Heisman winner, and they're on their way to the championship game. It's a no brainer. Dumb, but what else did you expect... Given the situation, I mean.
     
  8. bigpop713

    bigpop713 Freshman

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    3

    yea you right. in my opinion it should be the best player period. the position and team should not matter
     
  9. Bengal Buddy

    Bengal Buddy Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2004
    Messages:
    12,599
    Likes Received:
    520
    The problem with the Heisman is that it is supposed to be for the most outstanding player in college football. However, unless you are an offensive player, you can pretty much forget about it. Perhaps a solution would be to have two Heisman Trophies: one for offense and one for defense.
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. Contained Chaos

    Contained Chaos Don't we all?

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    9,467
    Likes Received:
    2,124
    Yeah, that's why I said 'the best player on the best (perceived) team.' It's supposed to go to the best player overall, not the MVP of the then No. 1 team.
     
    1 person likes this.

Share This Page