Why Jesus wouldn't vote for Obama

Thats below the belt Amigo

 

This is a total strawman. A few radial pro-choice folks bombed abortion clinics or killed doctors and they were condemmed by the rest of the pro-life movement.

Pro-life is not a religious issue. It is a basic human rights issue. If we are content to allow the un-born to be murdered it is a poor reflection on our society.

Of course killing abortion doctors is wrong, but so is killing the unborn. Since we do not know when life begins we should err on the conservative side and outlaw abortion.

 

I said that in response to you not being on the same page as the rest of us.
This thread has nothing to do with Roe vs Wade thats why I responded and said in my response to you that this is talk for another thread.
You still don't see where I was coming from.

I disagree.
Abortion may be legal but that does or doesn't make it moral.
Speaking of Roe vs Wade, lets have a vote, it would never happen.
The route Roe vs Wade took to become law was bad law.
About your silly polls, polls are polls and people change over time.

You talk as if liberals never assasinate anyone and are innocent victims.
Librerals never do anything wrong.
Keep Dreamin Amigo

Final point:
Most of your responses to me had nothing to do with this thread?
The thread was about Obama not signing a bill 3 times to protect a babies life that survived an abortion.
It had NOTHING to do with your responses!

 

So you are arrogant enough to tell me what i think and where I coming from.
It's enteresting that I agree with Supafans and shane 911.
Your just wasting time and cyberspace.:wave:

 

Evidence?
All kind of vile language?
I haven't said one bad word although I would argue that babies have survived an abortion some time and then are murdered.

Again, like Liberals never do or never have, right?
Your world is all one sided isn't it?:rolleye33:

Boy, I must have ticked you off for you to go off this way.
Nothing personal

EDIT: Oh by the way, as it turns out, all evidence on the web says that the Anthrax killer is a registered Democrat:lol:
I will bring this up everytime you bring up the five bad bombers on the right.
Disprove that he was if you can!:lol:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Bruc...ox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7ADBF

 

You said you were "coming from the opposite position" of me, concerning the issue of letting babies die when they survive abortion.

I said "no, you aren't", because I agree with you on this.

What part of this is assumptive or arrogant?

You do understand that I am not arguing against you. I am debunking this ladies obviously made-up testimony. How many times do I need to say this?

Here's one more, since you just seem to skim over what I write, without understanding it.

I AGREE WITH YOU THAT BABIES SHOULD NOT BE LEFT TO DIE WHEN THEY SURVIVE AN ABORTION. OUR POSITIONS AREN'T OPPOSING.

Here's one more

I AGREE WITH YOU THAT BABIES SHOULD NOT BE LEFT TO DIE WHEN THEY SURVIVE AN ABORTION. OUR POSITIONS AREN'T OPPOSING.

And finally, this one might sink in

I AGREE WITH YOU THAT BABIES SHOULD NOT BE LEFT TO DIE WHEN THEY SURVIVE AN ABORTION. OUR POSITIONS AREN'T OPPOSING.

If this sounds arrogant, it's because I've said the same thing to you in several posts, and you still don't understand it. How many times do I have to repeat myself, amigo?