Why Jesus wouldn't vote for Obama

You've got a point there :hihi:

 

Therein lies the problem, trying to keep Jesus out. I'm sorry you feel that way.

 

I'd be pretty surprised if Obama supported allowing a surviving baby to be thrown in the trash. You are being disingenuous and misrepresenting Obama to demonize him. I don't mind that you don't want to vote for Obama, but is intellectual honesty too much to ask for? We get propaganda from the media and most politicians, do you really have to perpetuate it?

 

Hyperbole?

 

Sorry to tell you bro but its all congressional testimony. The hospital in Illinois was leaving these babies in a linen closet to die. Sorry if you are so ef'd up on obama cool aid to believe that or not but it is what it is. Not once, not twice, but three times he voted AGAINST allowing these babies to be cared for. How proud are you to have that bumper sticker on your ride now?

 

The real reason why he voted no on the bill, like someone said earlier, its always 2 sides to a smear. There where 3 different versions of this bill in the state legislature, which was very different from the US legislative version of the bill. That he voted yes on.

By deliberately or inadvertently confusing the controversy that surrounded a local measure with the near-unanimous reception of a less-impactful federal bill with a similar name, Obama's enemies have concocted a narrative that misleadingly makes him appear a unique and horrifying monster in American politics.

 

I read enough to know that what you just wrote is a huge cop out. Both parties use this cop out when they take a tough position but don't have the cajones to accept the full brunt of the blowback.

My attitude? I have three beautiful kids who I tried very hard to have and that EXPERIENCE drives my CONVICTION that abortion is not something I'm willing to condone with my vote. And I don't believe in Jesus, meat.

You see. Not everyone who distrusts Liberals and values life is a right wing Christianist Republican nutjob.

:thumb:

 

Partially correct. Obama said he would sign a bill that contained the same language as the federal bill, and they re wrote it verbatim to the federal bill and he voted "present" again which in reality is a NO vote. You can't win this one MM. I know you have your boys back but he is ... I'll just leave it at that.

 

The federal bill was subsequent of the state bill, it did not have the same language, you know I would have considered that if it where true, before I posted my rebutal. If he is wrong on something I would say he is. But this one is an overreach. The 3rd time they wrote it, it still had some of the same language and stipulations of the first and second, it wasnt verbatim. Im not trying to win anything, I just understand it a little better.

 

Here is the deal we can argue about this forever, but I have read both of these sites because I wanted to see the truth or lies in the matter, considering the sources here both sides are overly conservative to say the least.
I had to research it more myself, but not from these sites.