Why gun owners oppose ban on "assault weapons"

Winston1 · Jun 23, 2016

With all the hysteria about so called assault weapons the facts always get in the way.
Http://www.businessinsider.com/gloc...) 2016-06-23&utm_term=Business Insider Select

shane0911 · Jun 23, 2016

Somewhere @Jmg is smiling

LSUTiga · Jun 23, 2016

HalloweenRun said: ↑

The problem is that there is no such thing, in the civilian world as "an assault rifle."

Since they only exists in the minds of the anti-gun crowd, they cannot be strictly defined. Since one can't be strictly defined, it is IMPOSSIBLE to limit a ban on just "assault weapons." It would look pretty stupid if the liberals tried to ban scary, black guns. That is about as close to a definition as you are going to get, that does not sweep in many, many legitimate hunting rifles.

A more rational venture would be limiting magazine capacity. Not saying I am for that, but at least it would be quantifiable.
Click to expand...

Shhhh. And I agree completely. It's also why I purchased a few extra 15 round mags for my Glocks. My G 26 a.k.a. Baby Glock, only has a 10 round mag. The magazines are interchangeable though. I can shove a 15 round magazine in it and it'll work fine. Just has a lot sticking out of bottom.

Log in or Sign up

Why gun owners oppose ban on "assault weapons"

Winston1 Founding Member

shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

Share This Page