Aww words of the ignorant trying to be funny but just throwing me another lob........educated individuals in this particular personal field know a gag reflex can't ever be completely eliminated, but it can be controled......only time mine is out of control is when I laugh......que the derail, Sorry Mr. Red.
We have won two NC's with game managing qb's. Not runners at all but mobile enough. You don't need a running QB to win a NC. This is ridiculous. It doesn't matter how many teams have won with a runner at QB even though u threw that out there with no facts. You are stating that u have to do it with a runner and we have done it twice without runners and JL got us to 8-0. Not Jefferson. Just saying. This entire thread is completely contradictory to what has actually happened. How long have you been watching football? LSU football? Sports?
And Luck would be an All -American at any university that fields a football team. This is supposedly one of the best qb's to come along in a while and players like that aren't made by a system. I'm sure Luck could run any offense. He is the closest thing to a more mobile Peyton Manning from what I've seen. In a pro-style offense with talent around him, he would be even better.
Look here little man, if the best qb in the world can't go undefeated in a weak PAC 10 then how the hell do you expect him to go 12-0 in the sec? He would drop 1-2 games, bc he can't run the ball. When Arkansas beat LSU the year we won it all who the F did the razorbacks stick in at qb? Darren MF McFadden, why bc he can run the ball from the qb position in a wildcat formation. Now let this thread settle to the bottom of the sea. It's over.
Arkansas lost 5 games that year. Stanford has mid-level Pac 12 talent (at best) while LSU has the most talent in the SEC. Stanford would be garbage without Luck.
Fang may really be about 8-14 years of age. Let's all try to get along. If you do not like what he posts, than do not reply.
