1. The uranium story showcases what fake news is. I don’t for a minute think they make shit up, but they do not report sooo many stories that do not fit their agenda,

    Last night, on MSNBC, some loser was going to extreme lengths to “prove” the Dem funding had been reported over a year ago, by David Corn, and therefore it is a non-story/event.
    LSUpride123 likes this.
  2. For crying out loud you are going to have so much egg on your face when its proved Trump didn't colude with the the Rooskies it will take Foghorn Leghorn to clean you up.
  3. collude

    I like eggs, but I don't think I'll get any,.. Trump's gonna get dumped

    today's impeach-o-meter
    [​IMG]
    slightly cooler, down from a high of 60
  4. "Heap big smoke no fire"
    P4PzNoF1uXHuKEUdEwP5Q3Cv.jpeg 09143-cov-tirefireonline.jpg
  5. enjoy this dead period, but realize,.. Manefort is soon to be indicted for money laundering,.. that same accusation has been following Trump for decades. Trump has long been known to associate with organized crime kingpins, mostly Russian ones.

    Mueller's investigation now includes the IRS looking into Trump's business's and his business associates. Moe, the IRS has all of Trump's tax records,.. two things for you to think about,.. Manefort-plea bargain in exchange for testimony,.. and Donald Trump-tax evasion.

    Have your fun, Kiki,.. woof it up while you can.

    Paul Manafort Reportedly Owed Millions to Russian Oligarch Before ...
    Could Paul Manafort Bring Down the Whole Trump Family? | The Nation
  6. Opening an investigation into one thing and filing charges on a different thing is shit. In the end I'm sure trump is guilty of tax evasion. I would venture most if not all billionaires are. But that is not collusion which the investigation was supposed to be about.
  7. IF that is all they find, they investigative team will face their own legal troubles.
  8. No, the investigation is about Russian interference in our election

    Special prosecutors follow where the evidence leads them

    Ken Starr's investigation was supposed to be about Whitewater,.. not about, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman", but that didn't seem to bother the republicans. Did you complain about Starr's over-reach?
  9. [​IMG]
  10. I didn't because I viewed his sexual relationship with someone who he had direct influence on as wrong. Remember that was right after the whole tail hook scandal time. And we in the military were getting ram roded with harassment training.
    I already said I bet trump is guilty if tax evasion. If fbi thinks that then open an investigation into those affairs. Don't use this "Russian influence" as you call it for that.
    GiantDuckFan likes this.