News Who Controls What You See & Shapes Your Opinions?

Every day you still choose to lose...

Yes, he did say thre was no proof. Which, you know, is false. You can simply goolge it. Plenty of hits come up. Plenty of charges both at the fed, state, and local levels.

The problem, you see, is there is no federal judicial pathway to overturn Jan 6th proceedings. As you know, this is why the Dems protested as much in 2017 when Donald Trump 1st won.

 

You dont know that. The Dem effort was to block all efforts of audits.

Question, is it hypocritical of you to suggest investigating everything about Trump but saying there is "no reason" to investigate an election of mail in voter fraud? When you supported the bogus and fake Russia gate hoax?

Seems like the logical and reasonable thing to do is give Trump the investigation to learn the truth. If Truth is important to you.

You know, like we learned you believed the Russia hoax. It was all lies. You know, the investigation finally proved that.

Wouldn't you agree an investigation would put it to rest?

Better for democracy yes?

 

.... i thought this was the jew bashing thread....

carry on...

 

It would be easy to say comey "helped" elect trump but the bottom line is trump won. no fraud about it.

 

Correct. But the Dems got to investigate for years to conclude this.

Why doesnt Trump get the same opportunity?

 

I just saw you start in on Jan 6 when someone said we needed to make sure the elections were secure. I must’ve missed the post above mine that said it was stolen.

 

XXL has tried to get that rolling multiple times. No one seems to care enough.

 

well i wish the dems would admit that instead they try to destroy democracy and incite violence by claiming the russians hacked the election and installed trump as an illegitimate president.

thats not a big deal really but it angered trump so much i think he decided to do it back to them.

 

That’s a lie and you should know it. I never said Trump colluded with the Russians. I did accept that an investigation was warranted because of the seriousness of the charge. If you look at my first post in that thread I said only if he was found to have participated in any so called collusion should he be charged. I stated that things like obstruction generated by the investigation would be BS if there were no collusion. I never supported the first impeachment. Quit making things up out of whole cloth.

 

thats not how you justify investigations. you dont justify investigations by claiming you need evidence so you have to investigate for it. its a catch 22.

"the seriousness of the charge" is utterly irrelevant. i could charge you with genocide, without evidence, and that doesnt justify investigating. even tho thats a very serious charge.

what the dems have done is use the investigation itself as the damning event, to trick you. and it works every time, as you always say they almost got him now, and he is angry and insiders are turning against him. you, being utterly ignorant of how the law works, depend on the media to tell you. and they tell you, wrongly, that he is definitely fucked every time. and they are always wrong. one would hope you would learn that eventually.

you do in fact think they almost have him now dont you? cant answer huh