I think we have all the context we need. He asked the man to go out and say that they "recalculated" and found enough votes to put Trump over the top in Georgia. It's clear as sunlight.
It's clear he asked him. It's unclear he broke any law in doing so. If he had said I'll pay you 50 bucks to do it, you might have something better than shit to stand on. Context.
the most glaring would be when he asked the GA SOS to "recalculate" the votes so that he could receive enough votes to win the election in GA. Three times those votes have been counted so when you ask to "recalculate" you are asking to cheat. That is breaking the law.
Then quote the exchange. Not one word. I know why you won’t. Doesn’t support the narrative. Trump made is case pretty clear. It was to recalculate after, key word, they throw out the illegally cast ballots his team outlined. Be better.
But there are no illegally cast ballots. None. Zero. Not a damn thing Trump brought up in that call is truth...it's just bull shit. The GA SOS said the same thing. It's untrue. Just like the crap that you spew around here... bull shit. Trump's lawyers have been asked repeatedly in court, "do you have any evidence of election fraud?" Every single time they have answered no. Not one single shred of evidence exists of any kind of fraud so you and Trump are just spinning your wheels here. Trump has no case to make. If he did he would have done so in the 60 something lawsuits that have been summarily thrown out of court for a lack of evidence. Stop pretending any of this is true...it's just a big lie. There was no fraud. Trump is simply trying to overturn a duly elected President who won by 8 million votes. It will fail.....it already has...over and over again.
Can you stay on topic. They outlined cases of ballots being counted directly contradictory to Georgia Law. Georgia had no answer for this on the call. They also refused to supply any data. I do not need to argue with you. Plenty of evidence exists. Fraud is separate from procedural election laws. If you want to talk about each court case then we can do that, but the manner in which you lump everything together is tiresome. ""do you have any evidence of election fraud?" Every single time they have answered no." This is a false statement. What you guys keep referencing are other cases not related to the Trump legal team. It would be nice if we could talk about these things without me having to defend the English language. It is boring how often you guys apply new meanings to words, statements, etc. You guys are just as bad as the media. The English language has been well defined for centuries. No need for you guys to invent new meanings to words based on who is saying them!
It doesn't matter if there is evidence or not ... it's not going to see the light of day, nor will it be brought to anyone's attention. ... and unfortunately, the APATHETIC American Public will let them get away with it.
It's kinda like these guys .... "scientists" show all these votes taken away from Trump MUST WATCH VIDEO: Data Scientists Discover Over 432,000 Votes Removed From President Trump in at Least 15 Counties in Pennsylvania (thegatewaypundit.com) In the press release, "votes were moving around for all candidates". My question is ... why are votes moving around at all.
