What will it take to play top opponents at night?

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by 2arms2legsTIGER, Mar 27, 2007.

  1. TerryP

    TerryP Founding Member


    Versus Notre Dame putting Weiss at 3.3 million, 3 years ago? Saban is making a bit more than that his first year here, it's not the 4 million figure you see bantered about. Over the 8 year period, IT WILL average out to 32 million.
     
  2. TerryP

    TerryP Founding Member

    We agree, but are just looking at this from different angles I suspect. The differences I see, compared to what you are putting out there, is the amount of commercial revenue that's going to come into programs. Now, the paragraph quoted below mentions a 25 year span. That, I could agree with, but won't begin to speculate as to how they'll accomplish their goal.

    Over the next decade or so I suspect, as it has for the last 5-6 decades, for the revenue (outside the normal tickets, etc) to continue being raised as it is. We'll see companies contribute a lot of money, but it won't fall under the "naming rights to the West side restroom facilities." (Unless that would be Yellow Wood, and I'd agree to that one in a heartbeat.)

    Interesting NASCAR thought...would be a great game-day addition.

    $50 mill over 5 years? If the program (as in entire Ath. program) is making the money to afford that, I see no problem with it.

    You mention the higher ed budgets. One area, we haven't discussed here, is the amount of increase we've seen in Tuscaloosa on just that front. Nationally, (media wise, etc.) they don't tend to report those increases but use that line "it's taking away from the educational side." Facts are, Ath. Dept's that are successful tend to contribute millions to that side.

    Just as example, and I'll take a team that hasn't seen the national spotlight, the enrollment for freshman at USC increased by over 20% just with the announcement of Spurrier as HC...as did grants, research projects, etc.

    Bottom line with me, I understand it's a money business, and I see spending the money to lead that business as money well spent. Those who voice criticism for it usually have an agenda.
     
  3. LSUGradin99

    LSUGradin99 I Bleedeth Purple 'N Gold

    :dis:
     
  4. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Sure fellers, Bama has more money than God, more tradition than Western Civilization, and the second-best coach that ever lived. They are strong . . . they are invincible . . . they are woman!

    Now, back to the subject of LSU getting night games on television . . .

    I'm thinking about the past and the future. The youngsters don't remember but there was a time when there wasn't much college football on TV at all. There were only three TV networks. People mostly listened to college football on the radio.

    LSU football games enjoyed widespead popularity in the country, especially the southeast, because the games were at night and most other college games were already over and because two 50,000 watt clear channel frequency stations (WWL in New Orleans and KWKH in Shreveport) carried the games all across the country. There were no package deals with the SEC or the networks.

    TV network competition caused the current situation as the conferences tried to get all their schools on the air and the networks recognized the market.

    But in the future, there will be hundreds and hundreds of new digitial TV channels. Big football schools already have their own pay-per-view networks and soon they will start having their own digital channels. Then it may return to something similar to the old days when you could dial in multiple games depending on the radio reception. With satellite TV and no network contract, schools could play their games whenever they think they would get the best audience. That would be night at LSU.

    Football fans will just get a cable TV package that lets them choose to watch any college game they like. Networks that decide to pick up a game will have to pick them up when they are being played. I think this is the only situation where LSU will get to play a big game at night anymore. even then, LSU might decide to play many of them in the daytime to broaden their audience. Bama and Notre Dame might play some night games for the same reason.
     
  5. TerryP

    TerryP Founding Member

    I came close to mentioning that very fact earlier this morning. Considering the majority of the schools in the SEC already have agreements with XM Radio, etc, not to mention Yahoo...and, you'll find a lot of streaming videos available on school web sites, I can see the University's going to an "LSU channel," etc.

    24 hour access...pay per view basis, own individual channel. I'd pay for it in a heart beat. That alone, would pull a lot of the commercial aspect/possibilities out of the picture to a degree...
     
  6. GetBackToWork

    GetBackToWork Founding Member

    This will certainly extract a new layer of revenue. The key in much of this is to capture a larger share of the consumers entertainment dollar. Crowd out competitors like professional sports, NASCAR, and movies, offer new products like this, and trump up the buy-in element (as in, you, Sports Fan, are part of us). Schools have a natural edge with this as people truly can be associated with these organizations in one way or another, unlike professional teams and the rest.

    NASCAR and bowl games point to the future, though. Miss State would be a prime candidate for this route. It's really not too hard to mentally hear some future announcer chime in, "Up next, the Farmer's Mutual/Mississippi State Bulldogs versus the FedEx Florida Gators."
     
  7. TerryP

    TerryP Founding Member

    I don't know the exact figures, but I'll see if I can find out Monday...

    UA has a web site that runs 120 a year/12 bucks a month. All proceeds go directly to the Ath. Dept. During the summer months, there isn't much of it worth the $$, but during camps in the spring and fall, and the sport seasons the interviews, coverage of halftimes and after game speeches, etc. make it very well worth the $. It a primary source for watching a lot of UA activities, like the LSU v Bama baseball game last night in streaming video.

    When I think about that, considering a lot of people pay 20-30 bucks to watch one pay-per-view game, the revenue stream is almost uncalculatable. Would you rather watch ESPN on a Saturday night or watch your own University's broadcast team on LSU TV? Heck, a lot of the time I'll listen to the UA team announce the game while watching it on TV. (at least they know the players names, and how to pronouce them :hihi: )

    I figure there are at least 10K that subscribe to the website...so, there's quite a lot of money sitting here just to be asked for...

    "This latest highlight has been brought to you by John Deere, official sponser for Auburn football."
     

Share This Page