@Rex you asked me to take this question to the proper thread, and i politely did. what was burisma paying hunter for? does he have expertise on energy or ukraine? doesnt seem like he would.
As is customary, for being a member of their Board. On energy, not so much. Hunter was paid for his legal expertise, not for energy expertise. On Ukraine he would have had access to his father's knowledge, and he was obviously made a member of Burisma's board for what they perceived as influence. Now, in a transaction a thousand times as large, explain the TWO BILLION DOLLARS the Saudis handed over to Jared Kushner: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/05/jared-kushner-affinity-partners-saudi-arabia[/user][/user]
we both know this is not true, but you say it anyway. its interesting the way slavish devotion to partisanship makes a person a liar.
again, we both know thats not what he was paid for, anymore than jared kushner get the saudi billion because he is such a magnificent money manager. even hunter himself doesnt lie about this as much as you, he says he got the job because he is a biden.
It's not all he was paid for, as I said. He received compensation for being a board member, and was put there because of his legal expertise and because of some perception of advantage to the Biden name.
You obviously can't read. That's exactly what I said. Which of these words are foreign to you? On Ukraine he would have had access to his father's knowledge, and he was obviously made a member of Burisma's board for what they perceived as influence.
this is not true. even hunter himself doesnt lie about this as much as you, he says he got the job because he is a biden.
