War on Women, or Women in War

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LaSalleAve, Sep 10, 2015.

  1. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,743
    Likes Received:
    11,273
    We sure didn't let effectiveness be a concern with minorities and affirmative action.
     
    Bengal B likes this.
  2. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,753
    Likes Received:
    23,932
    Nah
    This is just dumb.

    Yes I'm aware that a couple of broads just made it through Ranger school. Good for them. In the end, women in combat is a terrible idea. Much more to follow, got a coaches meeting to get to
     
  3. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,753
    Likes Received:
    23,932
    Sort of
     
  4. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,743
    Likes Received:
    11,273
    Does sorta give new meaning to the term "Fox hole."
     
    Bengal B likes this.
  5. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,753
    Likes Received:
    23,932
    No

    Regardless of branch, in physically demanding jobs they don't perform as well because they are not capable. End of story.
     
  6. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,753
    Likes Received:
    23,932
    And that is an entirely different can of worms. I don't care how ugly, you put a woman in a platoon full of G.I.'s one of them is going to tap it. First. Then the others are going to fight over who gets to do it next.
     
  7. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,743
    Likes Received:
    11,273
    No doubt. Men are dogs. Hell look what happens when you lock them up with ONLY men. sheesh, tiga ain't down with that.
     
  8. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    Soldiers lives weren't on the line.
     
  9. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,994
    They could have been if a soldier was operated on by a doctor who only got into medical school because of affimative action.
     
  10. uscvball

    uscvball Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    10,673
    Likes Received:
    7,156
    Agree 100%. And I'll add that a woman's presence is dangerous in actual combat because a man may hesitate or behave as nature intended and go into protective mode, rather than focus on the task at hand.

    Women shouldn't be on nuclear subs either for the reasons you pointed out and it's a distraction to the environment and the work.

    Those women "Rangers" are not going to actually be doing the job and they entered the program by passing unidentified "tests". There are so many ways women can participate in the service. Combat and special forces shouldn't be on the table.
     
    tigerchick46 and shane0911 like this.

Share This Page