Wrong, an accident is something that was unintentional, whether irresponsible or not. Never said it was, I said running into the people was an accident. No one has defended the drunk from being irresponsible and negligent. Amigo, we all understand, the argument is over the whether the drivers murder is justified. Then why are you arguing with me?
Gary Plauche is a cold-blooded murderer. Do you think Doucet's family has a right to execute Plauche?
And I don't see it that way and apparently neither does "the system" since he never served a minute in jail. And no of course Doucet's family has no such claim. GP didn't kidnap and molest one of their children.
Neither did OJ. Jury's sometimes suck. But Plauche got a trial, did Doucet? He killed their son in cold blood! Plauche's son is alive. That was an allegation. It was never proven and never will be, now. Another allegation is that Doucet was involved with Plauche's wife and THAT was the reason for the execution. Would that have been OK, too? Don't you think a trial was in order?
No you are wrong. I would bet you $100 to a bucket of crap that had dude not been hammered those two boys are still alive, that amigo is not an accident. That is cause and effect, action/reaction. Irresponsible was getting behind the wheel after he was smashed. If you hit a kid that darts out into the street chasing his basketball, that is an accident, when you are drunk as a skunk and plow into a couple of kids pushing a car down the street that is not an accident. Then why are you arguing with me? Because you keep trying to find sympathy for the idiot that killed a couple of kids. His actions cannot be excused
Doucet's had a sheet for being a pedophile, he took GP's son and went across state lines. What more do you need?
