Re: DC Watch: John Chavis 1st half = 29 running plays , 11 passing plays (72.5% run) 2nd half = 15 running plays , 10 passing plays (60% run) explain to me again which half was the conservative kill the clock half
Re: DC Watch: John Chavis No, Izzy. Arky figured out which 7 plays he was able to run and shut him down. JJ looks very good potentially. But he LOST the Arky game. As in did not win. Against Arky. But since Lee is a bum, lets just focus on that.
Re: DC Watch: John Chavis He saw significant playing time in two games and we lost both. I love scrambling QBs, Jefferson looks like he has potential, but it is too early to write of Lee or anoint Jefferson.
Re: DC Watch: John Chavis Point being, I proved you wrong with every example listed. So you move on to another player. As to Jefferson, I thought he did well considering how little he obviously knew of the playbook. Better than I expected and he still did not do squat in the 2nd half. But I don't blame him. He was as ready as he could be, and it was obvious that Lee knew more plays. IMO, the rest of the team quit on him like they did Lee. That's just from observing a few games on TV and several in person. At the bama game I kept checking to make sure JJ didn't run to the locker room, because while warming up on the sidelines(almost all game), he looked like he would crap his pants at the thought of getting sent in to play. His eyes were as big as saucers. Something tells me that the coaches might have more insight. Having actually worked with him in practice. Ducks on the pond...
Re: DC Watch: John Chavis Hell, since TheDude knows everything, I hope LSU hires him as the everything coordinator. So, he guides the team to a 30-14 lead, the defense implodes, giving up 17 points, and that's Jefferson's fault. ROFL I guess the fact that there was no running game outside of JJ and absolutely no pass or run blocking the entire game was his fault too. Puh-lease.
Re: DC Watch: John Chavis The coaches are perfect. Ducks on the pond? More like lemmings off a phucking cliff.
Re: DC Watch: John Chavis I'm not opposed to criticism, I simply believe your exuberance for Jefferson is a bit unfounded at this point in time. Can't speak for TheDude, though it's practically killing me to agree with the guy.
Re: DC Watch: John Chavis No the are not. But you should come up with defensible conclusions. Yes, quite.
Re: DC Watch: John Chavis That statement right there is just bas a$$. I was at the Arky game, and regardless of what everyone says, JJ gave us every option to win the game. Hell at 30-14 shortly after the 2nd half started... not only should we have been able to move the ball atleast one more drive for a freakin FG, but we should've atleast been able to win with a generic form of the prevent defense... But it seemed the only thing being called was either run, run, run, punt... or run, run, reciever drops pass, punt. Then throw in the D bs and we have a serious issue needing corrected.
