Of course it is: anyone who disagrees with Trump is automatically labeled a "cuck." Never. I don't need to be. And he has been about the only Republican member of congress who has publicly voiced support for Trump's recent policy roll outs. Then why didn't they? Back to cursing and calling names I see. But it isn't debatable. You cited one poll to prove your point when everyone knows that Rasmussen is the most Republican leaning poll. I cited an average of ALL polls, a better indicator of where the country really is. Trump is under water and under water big time. LOL....you're mad because I ignored your question but you ignored my question about Trump gaining or losing votes. That's why I had to ask you again. Do you think Trump has won or lost votes since the 2016 election? And you are counting on it to happen that way again? Seriously? So you are in essence saying that you are hoping that the Dems run Hillary again so Trump can win. That's at least a tacit admission. Back to calling names again. Sad. Just sad.
Not everyone. Just the cuckish ones. Then learn how to not only read, but comprehend. Yes. He has been against our military expansion from the start. I think I made the point pretty clear. But it is. You are debating me now with "other polls". I am telling you that its impossible to answer without knowing who will run. For example, if HRC runs, Trump likely pulls in more votes. If someone else runs, Trump might not have "as many" votes. People vote against people more than they vote for someone. The problem is you lack the necessary brain-cells to keep up. You must be a god damn retard if that is what you got. Look, dont reproduce. You are clearly slow and lack fundamental comprehension skills. Then: Then: Not mother fucking once did I say the word "hope". "you are in essence saying that you are hoping that the Dems run Hillary again so Trump can win." Like, you are intentionally argumentative or just simply that stupid. Yea, you've never called me names.
I know enough about these damn things to be dangerous. Thank goodness for our granddaughter's help. Without her I would be in deep shit with this computer.
I've heard this line repeated but I've never seen anything to prove it so in all honesty I really don't know. That said, it is one poll of many that are published regularly. It has historically been a right leaning poll. That's doesn't mean that it's results are no good, just that they should be taken in context. The Quinnipiac poll is the same for the Democrats. So to answer your question I am not discounting the Rasmussen poll, I am simply taking it in context along with the other 10-11 tracking polls that are out there. If you take an average of them all Trump is under water by 9.6 points today. Rasmussen has him down by 6 and Gallup has him down by 15. They are the tow outliers.
Yes, there are numerous other polls that track the same thing that Rasmussen does. So discounting them all because they are not as favorable to your candidate is silly. So you can call it a debate if you want but math is math. Trump is down by 6 in the Rasmussen poll, he is down by 15 in the Gallup poll. On average, of all the tracking polls he is under water by 9.6%. There is nothing to debate. I posted the link to Real Clear Politics so you could see for yourself. The poll numbers are what they are. If you are "debating" them, then you are debating the poll numbers, not me. No, it's very simple really. In your opinion, if an election were held today would Trump get more or less votes than he got in 2016. I think you know the answer and you just don't want to answer. Ironically enough, that is the definition of being obtuse. Trump got 46% of the vote in 2016. He is currently tracking at 42.4 on RCP poll of polls. this actually depends on who is running. I would agree in the last election that more people voted for Trump because they hated Clinton and vice versa but when Obama was running I think both times he was elected by people who voted for his policies and not against those of McCain or Romney. Hey I'm not the one who said that we needed a swamp dweller to drain the swamp. I mean you literally told us that we needed a bigger fox to keep the other foxes out of the hen house. Before you start talking about comprehension skills you might want to consider your own logic. You getting mad, brah? LOL.....cuz it sounds like you getting mad.
