No it's actually her cherry picking what information is presented to support her narrative of bull shit. You got an argument to make them do it.
lol. Dude, I just skimmed and I got this much. You used a source but downplayed her source, that was your source; which is the source of my laughter as I watch a dog chase its tail. It's okay though. We all make mistakes. No one is right ALL the time, no one.
Of course you didn't read it. You guys are good at taking someone's word for it when it agrees with your ideology. Pathetic. If you have an argument to make then get off the sidelines and do it.
damn tigernc you got busted for arguing against a source that was your own by not even reading her replies. while you continued on and on. like many had always assumed many times before. just fucking own it for once. good god almighty. pretty damn funny though dude.
Dude. You have no proof of anything. You are arguing about what a private citizen did to earn money while ignoring HRC. You speak of ideology? i have never seen you be objective.
Exa exactly.....because it is a blog and not an article. Go back and read the article and the blog.... You will see what I'm talking about. USC is deflecting and trying to make the argument about who authored the article and blog rather than the contents.
I never argued about the author. The author is irrelevant. The contents of the article vs the blog are all that matters. Read them both and you will see for yourself.
nc you had them for a long time but vball showed up and took you to school... you're in trump-like trouble at this point