I am exactly right. Here you go....here is an article from the WSJ....an real article....not a blog post....that very clearly states that Trump hasn't been able to get a loan from US banks since the 90's. Instead he has gone to Deutsche Bank and even they have backed away since the housing crisis and Trump screwed them. http://www.wsj.com/articles/when-donald-trump-needs-a-loan-he-chooses-deutsche-bank-1458379806 Yes you do. What you cited was a blog post, which is only an editorial. It is someone's opinion and isn't journalism. It is therefore not held to the same standards. Further, I went on to show you that the numbers used in that blog post were from a document that came from the Trump Campaign. Credibility? How about find something with a little more substance. Keep believing that crap if you want but I've posted a link showing exactly why he has had to use Deusche Bank and why even they are no longer doing business with him after he screwed them too after the housing crash.
deflect, deflect, deflect.....you cite an old story that has been debunked time after time after time.....do you even realize that was first brought up in april of last year? Jesus you really are desperate to defend Donald aren't you? When you get all of your information from sources like that then no wonder you are so God damned clueless
You know when you delet or try to wipe a hard drive, you can run forensics on it and pull data back. Sometimes all of it. Sometimes pieces. Well. They found pieces as they stated. And here you acted like you knew anything about classified systems.
