They really think we are that stupid

Your use of the term lie is completely baseless and the repeated taunts of liar, whackjob and such are very tiresome.

I am not lying regarding this subject. I sincerely believe the information that I referred to; if it is incorrect I am not aware of it.

 

you should make an effort to accept reality for what it is and stop misrepresenting this so irresponsibly. it is wrong, disrespectful and stupid. there is no reason to seek out lies and accept them as truth, while actively avoiding the obvious truth, except for to be self-important and generally an ass. it is very clear what happened here. muslims attacked and murdered innocent americans. to distract the issue with your bull**** is just ****ing pathetic.

 

which is why i dont care to "lighten up" when it comes to this subject.

 

I purposely tried to keep the discussion on two points:

-The physics involved in the collapse of Bldg 7(in which no one was killed, to my knowledge....please correct me if I am wrong on that). I was interested in discussing the official story regading that building's collapse and nothing else about 9/11 at this point.

-In light of this subject I wanted to discuss the Climate Change subject and how government agencies go about distorting facts.


We were unable to stay on these two points despite me repeatedly conceding everthing about Towers 1&2. Because of this I am not going to make any comparisons about the IPCC issues. It's pointless.....

 

I think you are completely alone on the subject. And red probably won't come in here, because of a certain ratio

 

Just because the government distorts facts about one thing doesn't mean they distort facts about everything.
I don't believe anything the government tells me, I'm the biggest anti-government dude in this forum!

I think that would be smart on your part.
There never has been any evidence to suggest what you are trying to say!
All the witnesses including Martin would have to be paid off.
It is way to complex to keep secret after 8 years.
Look at the way John Edwards and Tiger Woods had to pay ppl off.
Martin, I want a loan if they paid you off!:dis:
I've been a good friend here!:rofl:

 

I knew it, I deleted the rest for confidential reasons!:lol:
The Bush haters are going to be pissed if they ever find out the rest of the story.
That reminds me, I sure miss Paul Harvey's the rest of the story.
Its a good thing he never got to your version!opcorn:

 

there is nothing wrong with the official story. there are absolute mountains of stupidity in the alternative explanations. they are beyond stupid.

again, it is totally logically inconsistent to accept that towers can fall/implode due to damage and fire in one case and not another. you cant keep claiming that building collapse is unprecedented if you concede the reality of 1 and 2.

the problem and the reason this is so stunning to me, is that you act like you are totally unable to understand what your allegations mean in terms of conspiracy. you refuse to even broach the subject when asked. as if you simply are not smart enoug to be aware that your points have logical conclusions that are very very stupid to the point of wild absurdity. as if all these ridiculous conclusoins must be accepted because you are unable to listen when materials scientists and structural engineers tell you exactly why the thing fell.

 

Originally posted by BengalBuddy:

yes, I see that now....which is why i said no point in discussing anymore.

My only point now was regarding the inability to have an enjoyable debate when someone goes back over a point that has been conceded. It's pointless.

I have to ask, though....what ratio?

 

well, technically, the ratio is in red's favor. but sometimes the "i" side of the ratio is so overwhelming in quality, it is magnified x10 to what the actual quantity is.