They really think we are that stupid

i am well aware that you frequent conspiracy lie websites. that doesnt prove much.

is your position that 1 and 2 were brought down with charges as well? if that is not your position, then why would you claim that implosion of a burned and damaged building is unprecedented?

lie. it was hit with significant debris. as i said, all the nearby buildings were hit hard. i saw the damage personally, but you never know i could be being paid by the secret frankensteins or whoever the conspirators are to say that.

 

YouTube - Peter Jennings (Live) on The Twin Tower Collapse

Forget that it's one of the Towers, for a moment. Did you hear Jennings comment that anyone who knows about this type of thing knows you have "to get at the under infrastructure to bring it down".

You don't find it at least suspicious that Building 7 came down like this Tower does....and Bldg 7 wasn't hit by an airliner. There was not jet fuel. There was debris and small office building fires.....and you think it just collapses? Please...

 

my grandma says the opposite. why is she less credible than a live report from a newsreader?

one guy who i was with in new york on sept 11 said he saw the plane hit and it was a military plane, painted green, like a foreign army plane. it was a confusing morning.

no, not suspicious. not even slightly. it was burning and it was damaged. the sprinklers were screwy. it was left to ruin by rescue workers who were distracted. it is magnificently unsuspicious that it collapsed. not one single bit of the official story is even slightly suspicious.

lies. massive fires gutted the place. not small office fires. you are lying again. once again, the firefighters left and let it burn. "small office fires", even the made up ones you describe, would not stay small if unchecked, would they, liar?

 

martin:

stop repeating yourself and trying to confuse the issue with Towers 1 and 2. I conceded the point already....jet airliner impact, jet fuel and whatever else. The point is conceded, already.

Building 7 is the key to the argument. Debris and small fires don't cause high rise buildings to collapse.

And you also readily concede the point that websites are not always accurate. You claim that the ones I refer to are not accurate. I claim the ones that you refer to are not accurate.

OK. Your websites are government websites or those support the governments story, mine are not associated with the government in any way.

You also concede that governments do distort facts for there own purposes, for example Climate Change. This is an issue where the gov't is not being accurate. It is therefore possible that they are inaccurate on this issue as well. You have to concede th point that it is possible the government is incorrect. It is possible.How do you tell? Because the government is asking you to believe that a 50 story high rise builing collapsed because is was bashed and burned.

This does not happen, it cannot happen. It has never happened. Ever.

 

again, that is contradictory. skyscrapers can either collapse from fire or they cannot. i have won this argument. and you are lying again. unchecked fired that burn unchecked in a massive building for hours do not count as "small fires". you lie alot.

correct. you are wrong and crazy and i am not. good work.

yes i know, popular mechanics is actually funded by the coalition for mass murdering folks on 9/11, which is an arm of haliburton.

because you have trouble believing reality, that doesnt mean everyone does.

it happened twice earlier in the day across the street. building bashed, burned and collapsed. twice, same day. across the street. it was on the news.

 

Hey, did the best I could...gotta take a break. Am I completely alone here on Tigerforums? Is there no one to take up the slack while I do something else?

Red, would you like to stand in for me just for chits and giggles?
opcorn:

 

red is a smart man who i do not agree with politically, but i respect. he is not a liar. he will not pick up your slack.

 

it would appear so.

chits and giggles? really? we are discussing the worst terrorist attack/mass murder in this country's history and it's fun and games to you?

and why on earth would red want to "stand in" for your giggling little game and post delusional squirrel turds?

 

alright...I've had enough, then. No point in discussing it if I'm a "lone wolf".

God Lord, man, lighten up.

 

spreading lies about a tragedy like this is irresponsible.