They really think we are that stupid

Originally posted by Red:

Every 110-story skyscraper hit by a jet airliner and gutted by fire has collapsed. A simple office building fire won't do it.

Assuming a skyscraper is a high rise building over 20 stories than not one has ever collapsed because of internal damage caused by fire. This is a fact and you cannot get around it.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by flabengal
Steel is pretty damn strong.

Originally posted by Red:

Actually gravity isn't stronger. That's why the buildings stay up. The steel has to reach very high temperatures to lose strength. Also, as a scientist you should know gravity is considered a relatively weak force compared to the forces at work on an atomic level that give steel's molecules their characteristics.

I expected better from you, Red.:wink:

 

my official story is that the first tower was hit and on fire before i got on the train to go one stop into wtc station that morning, and i saw it when i came out to go to work. but the real story is that i was tipped off by dick cheney who called me and told me to be damn sure not to go into work early that day.

 

lie

"Steel melts at about 2,750 degrees Fahrenheit—but it loses strength at temperatures as low as 400 F. When temperatures break 1000 degrees F, steel loses nearly 50 percent of its strength."

Rosie O'Donnell 9/11 Conspiracy Comments: Popular Mechanics Responds - Popular Mechanics

 

Public eduation is a probably failing. Evidenced by the fact that people can be told the GLOBAL WARMING IS CAUSING THE SNOWSTORMS TO BE WORSE.

Anyone who thinks they can determine the reason for the winter storms is delusional. The climate is way to complex for that kind of determination.

Besides, there are plenty of educated people who question the official version of 9/11.

 

again, you are lying by continually omitting the fact that the building was also severely damaged by debris. how many more times will you lie about that? you have already done it quite a few times.

http://www.pbs.org/americarebuilds/engineering/engineering_buildings_14.html

again, all the buildings around suffered some pretty bad damage, which i personally witnessed. i remember at the the time it was thought there was a chance that one liberty, which is across the street, might come down. the deutsche bank building across the street was so badly damaged that it has been dismantled. they found human parts in it, from all the destruction and flying debris in the area. but i know you know of that debris hurt wtc 7, because a sketchy website told you so.

 

Originally posted by OkieTiger_KATT:

I admit you are much better than I am at demonizing others. Try sticking to the facts and see how you do.

 

liars deserve demonization when they continue lying in the face of obvious reality.

 

Originally posted by Krypto:

Look, I freely admitted my knowledge of building design and engineer terminology is limited. Building 7 is a high rise. The comparison is only regarding other high rises. I have found some other links regarding those fires and will post one just for comparisons sake. The other buildings you listed were either:
a) not high rises
or
b) did not collapse.

from the article:

 

even if we concede that fire cant bring it down alone, we would still have to be lying and pretend that the building did not sustain heavy structural damage from flying debris, which you absolutely refuse to acknowledge, primarily because you are dishonest.

i have lost count of how many times you mention the fire and omit the structural damage. why dont you challenge yourself and see if you can lie about it 3 more times. you could probably pull that off.