The truth about Uranium One: Fox "News" lies

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Rex, Oct 31, 2017.

  1. Bayou Tiger

    Bayou Tiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,953
    Likes Received:
    2,164
  2. mancha

    mancha Alabama morghulis

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,802
    Likes Received:
    3,237
    I admit that I don't see the big picture on this Uranium One deal. If it is so cheap on the international market, why would Russian interests want to buy the company?
     
  3. watson1880

    watson1880 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,637
    Likes Received:
    2,009
  4. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    766
    The Washington Post looked into that and found no evidence to support it. The Foundation, the Foundation's employees, the wedding planners, the caterers, etc., all state that no Foundation money or resources were used. That fact that the Foundation's financial statements were audited with a clean bill of health tends to dispute it, anyway.

    The Clinton Foundation does actual charity work. Sterling reputation among charity watch groups.

    But we do know, don't we, that the Trump Foundation, with no such monitored reputation, is nothing more than a vehicle for Trump to funnel money toward himself... like that giant portrait of himself paid with Trump Foundation money to hang in one of his own properties:

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...k-portrait-trump-bought-with-foundation-money

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2017
  5. watson1880

    watson1880 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,637
    Likes Received:
    2,009
    [​IMG]
    Rex Rex Rex- an email from Band to Podesta saying that it is going on... yet...
    [​IMG]
     
  6. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    Pride, let's say you and Rex are both right and they both colluded with Russia. How can you still defend Trump and only want Clinton exposed?

    Me, I want everyone exposed.
     
    GiantDuckFan likes this.
  7. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    766
    Say what? That makes no sense.

    The Clinton information paid information ON Russia. It didn't work or collude with Russia.
     
  8. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    You understand what a hypothetical is right? Regardless, your faith and love of the Clinton's is just as disturbing as anyone's faith and love in Trump.
     
    Winston1 likes this.
  9. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    766
    To you, maybe, because you don't know any better. Trump is a piece of shit... SOLD EVIDENCE for that. Can't say the same about the Clintons. Republican smears don't amount to evidence.
     
  10. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,690
    Likes Received:
    16,629
    If you look closely at my posts, I only attack the emotional arguments made. Therefore I use the same logic applied to Trump and apply it to Killory. You see the results I get.

    To answer your post. I didnt vote for Trump. I voted against Killory.

    I have zero, ZERO, vested interest in Trump other than exposing every corrupt politician possible. All of them.
     

Share This Page