The Time to Act Against Iran Is Fast Approaching

You know how it is when people learn what they think are big and important words. They use them over and over and over.....

Then throw in a couple of other factors. Such as blind loyalty to a group, person, or idea to the exclusion of ever questioning it. Or being a one trick pony and saying the same "idea" over and over and over....

Now that you mention it, it is rather predictible and robotic. Good call!

 

LSUMASTERMIND

gross national debt as a percent of GDP
Reagan 1st term: +7.3%
Reagan 2nd term: +11.2%
Bush: +12.2%
Clinton 1st term: +3%
Clinton 2nd term: -9.8%
Bush 1st term: +5.6%
Bush 2nd term: 6.3%

I couldn’t help but noticing your absurd comparison above without pointing out that Congress and not the presidents control the purse strings of the government. Hence, Reagan and Bush I were strapped with Democrat Congresses, although I believe Bush I was really a stealth liberal like his son. After 1994, Clinton was strapped with Republican Congresses, which he fought tooth and nail every step of the way to block their reforms, which eventually led to the first surpluses in decades to emerge. Bush II was a compassionate conservative, which means that for all and intents and purposes he was really a stealth liberal. Not to mention that he also had Democrat Congresses during the last two years of his presidency.

Nevertheless, regardless of how liberal Bush was, Obama is a leftist on steroids who also has a rubber stamp Democratic Congress to cram his hope and change through. Hence, lets compare the Obama deficits to the Bush deficits:





It should be obvious to even you and everybody else, that leftist Presidents on steroids combined with Democrat Congresses make for a very volatile mixture where out of control spending is concerned.:insane:


Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

 

Ahab, did you get banned from the site? is that why you are back with a different name?

 

Here we go again with America's hypocritical policy.

Iran is doing nothing we wouldn't be trying to do ourselves if China was building a damn embassy in the Gulf Of Mexico.

Cause and Effect. Our Foreign Policy is a piece of **** that gets us in more conflicts.

 

look i agree with you about Sharia law. That is some f'd up garbage. But i think it is irresponsible to label the islamic religion in its full capacity as a bad thing without pointing out the flaws in other religions as well.

 

Your cultural relativism is atrocious. First of all, China can build all the embassies in the Gulf of Mexico it wants to. Hell, it controls the Panama Canal anyway, it is already drilling for oil off the coast of Cuba, and it is one of our most favored trading partners.

Not to mention that if you would read the article you would find out that the ruling Mullahs of Iran have announced their reasons for acquiring nukes on many occasions, and it is not for peaceful or defensive purposes. In addition, it will be a devastating blow to American prestige in the region, which because you are so morally confused, you believe would somehow be a good thing.

Hence, a la Ron Paul, bury your head in the sand and dream on. There are reasons that crackpot could only garner about 4 percent support of the American people (the kook brigade) to support him, and it’s because he is a crackpot when it comes to foreign policy and also because of his many off the wall conspiracy theories.

Anyway, your excessively narrow-minded cause and effect foreign policy ideas are really a bad case of blame America first self-hatred. If you didn’t already have a deep abiding distrusts for America, you couldn’t be as misguided as you are.

 

You are looking for an excuse to denigrate other religions. However, it’s not irresponsible because today only the adherents of Islam are killing disbelievers all around the world per the tenants of their religion and in that regard Islam is completely different from all other religions.

Indeed, what other religion other than Islam advocates forcing disbelievers to submit to its authority? What other religion’s adherents are perpetrating terrorism all around the world per the tenants of their religion? What other religion via the OIC is trying to make all criticism of Islam, legitimate or otherwise, an international crime? Only Islam!

As a matter of fact, in stark contrast to all other religions, Islam alone is a religion of submission, where all adherents are required to submit to the will of Allah at the same time they must also surrender their own free wills. Hence, there is no freedom of conscience allowed in Islam, which means Muslims can’t question the texts and tenants of their religion let alone apostatize from Islam without risking death.

In stark contrast, in all other religions faith is voluntary and the freedom of conscience is fully allowed. However, in Islam everyone, adherents and disbelievers alike, must submit to its authority if not spiritually, then corporally.

Moreover, on top of that, Islam is the only religion in the world that further commands its adherents to seek dominance over disbelievers by forcing disbelievers to submit to Islam’s authority via the imposition of Sharia. No other religion in that regard is remotely similar to Islam. I mean what other religion’s remedy for disbelievers are conversion, submission to the authority of Islam, or death.

Further, Islam as opposed to all other religions is also a very radical form of totalitarianism that seeks world domination. Just look inside every Muslim country in the world and what do you see? You see non-Muslim dhimmis and Muslim women systematically persecuted and violently oppressed. Hence, Islam must be resisted and defeated like all other radical forms of totalitarianism that seeks world domination.

Indeed, during the Cold War we didn’t allow millions of Communists to immigrate and infiltrate our countries because that would have been suicidal. Therefore, we must ban and reverse Muslim immigration ASAP because likewise allowing millions of Muslims to immigrate and infiltrate our countries is also suicidal. Indeed, without millions of Muslims living inside the USA as a 5th column, 9/11 would have been impossible.

 

Could someone please ban this guy. He's talking to himself now ^^^

 

Thats what happens with news bots, they can't discern their posts from someone elses.:hihi:

 

I think you're confused as to what open-mindedness is. Calling people kooks for not believing what you believe is narrow-minded.