The Rich needed the tax cuts...

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LaSalleAve, Feb 24, 2011.

  1. tirk

    tirk im the lyrical jessie james

    i dont think you're a plagiarist at all. I think you know what you're doing. Props my man, props.
     
  2. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    I never lose, though Red does toss out more useless data than anyone else. Here's why I'm a winner. I shoot from the hip based upon stuff that I just know. I spend no time trying to prove what I already know. Since I know it, why do I have to prove it to myself? Red googles stuff and ends up citing Wikipedia. For all I know, he puts it into Wikipedia himself and then cites it. The point is that he doesn't know sh!t until he looks it up. I just know sh!t and throw out the answer in real time. Red takes 3 days to "formulate" a response.
     
  3. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    I'm not racist. I hate pretty much everybody.
     
  4. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Yeah, why let things like fact and proof interfere.
     
  5. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Look it up if you are not convinced. Nobody's stopping you.
     
  6. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    thats actually kinda true. for example, to properly understand the glowal warming issue, you have to just understand human nature, and why people are motivated to believe we are killing the earth. you dont just say "well, science has a verdict" and thats it. the guilty liberal mind is a factor in many issues, but isnt well cited by google.

    i understand that. but the fact remains that you dont appear to understand that there are lots and lots of muslims that are exactly as peaceful as you and your christian friends.
     
  7. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Which is why you can't win an argument, of course. I can prove my points. You can bluster.

    You'd be surprised what I know, Gilligan.
     
  8. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    I've written pages of arguments citing scientific point by scientific point on climate change and you can find them all here with a simple search. Your failure to understand how science works is not my problem. Your objection to global warming is political, pure and simple.
     
  9. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    again, i will put it this way: at no point in time will scientists not have really valid-seeming evidence that we are destroying the earth. if it wasnt warming, it would be something else. and they would have mountains of evidence. there is a reason these kids go into climate science and study it. they want to find the evidence that humans are terrible. and they will find it, always.

    we need a human caused catastrophe destroying the earth in the exact same way we need god. cant find that kinda wonderful insight via wikipedia, gilligan.

    insert your pogo quote here
     
  10. Rwilliams

    Rwilliams Veteran Member

    Them damn Christians cutting peoples head off, stoning women to death and blowing up kids in the street. They're terrible I tell you just terrible
     

Share This Page