The Party of zero morals, zero patriotism, and extreme hypocrisy

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Rex, Nov 18, 2021.

  1. mancha

    mancha Alabama morghulis

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,799
    Likes Received:
    3,237
    AOC, who built her tough reputation in twitter attacks, is taking a break from twitter. She has been called out too much and it is hurting her fragile ego. The shine is wearing off of her.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ative-comments-gave-anxiety-having-COVID.html

    AOC announces on Instagram that she's taking a break from Twitter because 'negative comments' gave her 'anxiety' after she was mocked for breaking her own COVID rules to party maskless in Miami where she caught the virus
     
  2. Kikicaca

    Kikicaca Meaux

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    15,191
    Likes Received:
    6,596
    God didn't make you an idiot he gave you free will and you chose to be an idiot. However you are beyond idiocy don't know where to put but idiocy is above you.
     
    shane0911 and LSUpride123 like this.
  3. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    @Rex more from the ugly past of Joe Biden. Are you sure he cares for blacks…or only if they are nice cornpops and stay out of his way.
     
  4. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,712
    Likes Received:
    766
    This is not new news. Not a high point in his career, but his position was the same as 75% of America's at the time, and almost 100% of Republicans. So, if he's incriminated by that vote what does it say about Republicans? I fail to see how it rescues Republican racism to point out something that was worse for them? And, besides that, while Biden has certainly made amends with subsequent legislation we can't say the same for Republicans.

    You have seen me propose here funding for transportation to public schools, based on wealth and income... would you approve or disapprove?
     
  5. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,712
    Likes Received:
    766
    This is just silly. Nobody wears a mask outdoors, and she's quite far away from her lunch companion.
     
  6. fanatic

    fanatic Habitual Line Stepper

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    13,665
    Likes Received:
    6,012
    To the surprise of no one
     
    shane0911 likes this.
  7. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    Sport I’m not trying to rescue anyone. I’m pointing out the rank hypocrisy of democrats. You continually claim democrats are the party that isn’t hypocritical and only has the best interests of the people in their hearts. I call bullshit on that That’s all
     
  8. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    Another example of democrat hypocrisy. Prominent democrats continue to cheat on their financial reports.
    Rep. Jamie Raskin slapped with ethics complaint over failure to report wife's huge stock payout

    EXCLUSIVE:Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin was hit Monday with an ethics complaint over his failure to properly disclose stock shares that his wife – President Biden's nominee to be the Federal Reserve's top banking regulator – received for her work at a Colorado-based financial technology company.

    The American Accountability Foundation, a conservative ethics watchdog, said in a complaint to the Office of Congressional Ethics that Raskin had violated federal financial disclosure reporting obligations by waiting too long to report a huge stock payout that his wife, Sarah Bloom Raskin, received in December 2020.

    Jamie Raskin disclosed information about the transaction in August 2021 – eight months after Sarah Bloom Raskin sold 195,936 shares of Reserve Trust for $1.5 million, according to a federal financial disclosure. The document listed the initial transaction date as Dec. 18, 2020.

    "Sarah and Jamie Raskin are career politicians who have used the system to enrich themselves, and it is time that someone holds them accountable," Tom Jones, the founder of the American Accountability Foundation, said in a statement to FOX Business. "If House rules are going to mean anything, the House Ethics Committee needs to open an investigation and sanction Jamie Raskin for hiding this shady stock deal from the public."

    SARAH BLOOM RASKIN OPPOSED BY 24 STATE FINANCIAL OFFICERS OVER 'RADICAL' VIEW

    Lawmakers' spouses are allowed to trade in companies or industries that their partners may help regulate. But Jamie Raskin's failure to promptly disclose the shares that his wife sold marks a violation of the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act. The law – frequently referred to as the STOCK Act – was passed in 2012 in an attempt to increase transparency on Capitol Hill by making it illegal for members of Congress and their families to profit from inside information and requiring lawmakers to report stock trades to Congress within 45 days.

    Jamie Raskin, a prominent lawmaker who led the second impeachment trial of former President Trump, did not immediately respond to a FOX Business request for comment. But the Maryland Democrat has acknowledged the late filing and told Business Insider that the omission occurred because the transaction happened just before their 25-year-old son, Thomas, died on Dec. 31, 2020.

    "We lost our son during the reporting period, and I filed the report late," the congressman told Insider.

    While the complaint from the American Accountability Foundation conceded that the Raskins had lost their son during that time period and should be "afford[ed] some latitude in meeting filing requirements," it noted that the congressman quickly returned to his official duties in leading the impeachment charge against Trump.

    "If Representative Raskin was able to perform these official duties during this time, it is reasonable to expect that he should have been able to comply with the Periodic Transaction Report requirements during these times and not frustrate the legitimate ends of Congressional oversight by waiting nine months to disclose the sale," the complaint said.

    The oversight also comes at a pivotal moment for Sarah Bloom Raskin, who was formally nominated last month by Biden to serve as the Federal Reserve's vice chairwoman for supervision.

    As vice chair for supervision, Sarah Bloom Raskin – a Duke University law professor who has held high-level jobs at both the Treasury Department and the Fed – would oversee annual stress tests that review bank safety and liquidity. Her nomination has been welcomed by progressive senators and advocacy groups, who think she will take a tougher stance against Wall Street than her predecessor, Randal Quarles, a Trump nominee who stepped down in late December.

    But she has faced fierce pushback from Republican lawmakers concerned that her stance on issues like climate change could endanger the central bank's independence.

    SARAH BLOOM RASKIN GRILLED OVER CLIMATE VIEWS DURING FIERY CONFIRMATION HEARING

    The Fed nominee has previously argued that all financial institutions should reevaluate their relationships with energy companies and has advocated for a push toward sustainable investments that do not depend on carbon and fossil fuels. If banks and other financial institutions do not take these steps to distance themselves from fossil fuel companies, Sarah Bloom Raskin has said the Fed should penalize them.

    Sarah Bloom Raskin has also drawn scrutiny for her work at Reserve Trust: The nonbank fintech company is the only one of its kind to have received special access to the Fed's payment system – an occurrence that happened when Sarah Bloom Raskin served as the company's director.

    Access to Federal Reserve services is sought after by many fintechs and other nontraditional financial services companies, because there are a number of benefits, including the ability to borrow from the Fed's discount window and to earn interest from deposits at the central bank. Without a master account, nonbank financial institutions must partner with banks insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. in order to tap those services.

    Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., probed Sarah Bloom Raskin over her connections to Reserve Trust last week while the latter was testifying before the Senate Banking Committee, noting that many other nonbank financial institutions have applied and failed to receive a Fed master account. (The company even touts its access on the front of its homepage: "Move beyond the bank. Reserve Trust is the first fintech trust company with a Federal Reserve master account.")

    Sarah Bloom Raskin served on the Fed's board from 2010 to 2014 and was tapped by former President Obama to serve as assistant Treasury secretary. She joined the Reserve Trust board in May 2017, four months after she left the Treasury Department.

    CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

    Reserve Trust had its master account application denied in June 2017; one year later, the application was approved.

    Lummis questioned whether Sarah Bloom Raskin called the Federal Reserve to expedite Reserve Trust's application and said the nominee had called the Kansas City Federal Reserve in 2017 asking about master accounts.

    "Something doesn't smell right with the way this played out," Lummis said.

    Sarah Bloom Raskin denied any wrongdoing.

    "If you are suggesting anything improper, I want to make very clear: I have had the honor to serve in various public capacities, and each time I have left, I have been very mindful of rules regarding departure," she said.

    Megan Henney is a reporter for FOX Business. Follow her on Twitter @megan_henney.

    This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    ©2022FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved.
     
  9. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,558
    Likes Received:
    23,812
    and not a peep of it anywhere
     
  10. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,712
    Likes Received:
    766
    You didn't point out any hypocrisy, sorry. There are several reasons outside of intentionally segregating students for opposing busing.

    I notice you didn't answer my question about busing. Would YOU be in favor of issuing transportation vouchers, based on family wealth and income, to public schools?
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2022

Share This Page