The noose is tightening. Mueller impanels a Grand Jury.

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Rex, Aug 3, 2017.

  1. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    8? Is Trump going to cancel the 2020 elections or something? Or are you confident Russia will come through again?
     
  2. el005639

    el005639 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    4,580
    even in the primary's he was on carrying 35% of the republican voters...whats new?
     
  3. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    The only way Trump wins is if the Democrats run another dud. I mean Hillary had 3 million more votes than Trump. I can't stand her bitch ass but that shit ain't right.
     
  4. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    We are talking about 32% of Americans, not Republicans. On election day Trump got about 93% of the Republican vote. As of today he is at about half of that with Republicans.
     
  5. Kikicaca

    Kikicaca Meaux

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    15,191
    Likes Received:
    6,596
    Denial is not just a river in Egypt
     
  6. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
  7. el005639

    el005639 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    4,580
    Watch hillary run again
     
  8. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    If that happens Trump could actually carry the popular vote this time.
     
  9. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,690
    Likes Received:
    16,629
    Solid analysis. I mean, not.. In other words, the author doesn't know what is being talked about therefore it must be wrong.

    lol Cant make this stuff up. Here is a hint, if you dont know something, research it before you label it as false.

    As an example: Lawrence writes that “researchers penetrated what Folden calls Guccifer’s top layer of metadata and analyzed what was in the layers beneath.” What on earth is that supposed to mean? We don’t know what “metadata” we’re talking about, or why it comes in “layers,” and all I’m left with is the distinct impression that Lawrence doesn’t either. Even if you wanted to take this seriously enough to engage with, you can’t, because it only intermittently makes sense. There may be evidence out there, somewhere, that a vast conspiracy theory has taken place to cover up a leak and blame Russia. But it’s going to need to be at least comprehensible.

    http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/08/the-nation-article-about-the-dnc-hack-is-incoherent.html

    But I guess we should just believe NYMag as a solid source right?
     
  10. kcal

    kcal Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,843
    Likes Received:
    7,796
    my understanding is that the download speed indicated it could not have been transmitted, but that it was downloaded to a jump or thumb drive. if so, this really makes it interesting for wasserman shultz
     

Share This Page