The next step of abortions

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by saltyone, May 1, 2006.

  1. CParso

    CParso Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,852
    Likes Received:
    368
    Starve & kill? If Terri was able to function on her own, she would not have died. This was not murder. As I said, I would appreciate the same if in a similar circumstance and thus do consider this a right to die issue.
     
  2. LSUDeek

    LSUDeek All That She Wants...

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    6,456
    Likes Received:
    151
    no, im quoting the doctors. try reading the article sometime.


    Im fighting for the right of her husband to choose not to sustain vegetativeness.

    um, you'll be judged on whether or not you chose Christ bud. not whether or not you support not sustaining vegetables.
     
  3. CParso

    CParso Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,852
    Likes Received:
    368
    I do have the right to die. If on life support (even though you won't agree a feeding tube is life support), my care taker has the right to stop it if it's in my best interest.
     
  4. LSUDeek

    LSUDeek All That She Wants...

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    6,456
    Likes Received:
    151
    it makes plenty of sense if you understand the difference between a brain stem and all of the other parts of the brain necessary for cognitive function and movement.
     
  5. LsuCraig

    LsuCraig Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,607
    Likes Received:
    55
    It's not about what YOU would want in the case, who cares what you want.

    So wait, if the person can't live a life, then they should be killed by starvation? That's the legal line you'd like drawn for killing the sick? So kids with Down's, who can never live a true life, never live alone........man, that's sick. I'm telling you, killing the unwanted, the sick, the infirm is a path of which I do not want to go down. But there's enough people like you that want this so.......

    The only ones here who would benefit nothing from her death was her parents. There was no documents showing this was what she wanted, only her husband who stood to gain from it.
     
  6. CParso

    CParso Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,852
    Likes Received:
    368
    Her husband made the choice for her. He had to because nobody has written contracts that say how & when they should be let go in certain circumstances. He didn't gain anything financially from her death. I believe he had her best interest at heart.
     
  7. LSUDeek

    LSUDeek All That She Wants...

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    6,456
    Likes Received:
    151
    oh, and btw supa the doctors said it was impossible for her to swallow.
     
  8. LSUsupaFan

    LSUsupaFan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    8,787
    Likes Received:
    1,207
  9. LsuCraig

    LsuCraig Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,607
    Likes Received:
    55
    I don't but for you guys to sit here and say her brain was liquified is ridiculous. If it was liquified, she could not move guy. She made sounds like speaking, she was breathing on her own, moving her eyes.....at tiems she could follow her mother's hand.......

    Dr. Deek though says her brain was liquid.

    Who cares if it was though. There was no document saying she wanted this. The only ones with nothing to gain were her parents and they wanted her alive.
     
  10. LSUDeek

    LSUDeek All That She Wants...

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    6,456
    Likes Received:
    151
    this is all about persistent vegetative states and brain liquefaction. please stop extrapolating.
     

Share This Page