You are the only one that believes this as well. Schumer will find his dozen and squash this thing. You should be happy, I'm finally on the side of a democrat
Red just because the Iranians make a statement doesn't mean it is worth anything. The Iranian claim has no basis any is propaganda. Again Israel has ONLY stuck facilities that were engaged in making weapons to be used against them. They lived in peace with Iran until the nuclear weapons program. How would they attack Iran across several Arab countries? When have they threatened Iran's existence? As I said you argue in circles. Iran is building nuclear weapons because Israel may bomb their nuclear weapons facilities. Did Israel attack Syria or Iran again after they blew up an obvious and potent threat? Israel has not been and is not now a threat to any Muslim country that is willing to live in peace and not attack Israel. You ignore the fact their justification has no basis in fact and is a subtrafuge. It is as baseless as their claim that their nuclear research is for peaceful purposes only. You notice my criticism of the treaty has been muted. There are significant parts I dislike and I don't trust the Iranians. However at this stage I expect it is something that has to be tried. There is too great a push from the rest of the negotiators to cast it aside. Pakistan is focused on two things right now, India their mortal enemy and Afghanistan their greatest threat. It poses no creditable threat to Iran. Not even the Iranians make the claim. This argument is laughable it's so weak. Fair but the Ruusians also see it as a ways to hurt us more. Also isn't a little disingenuous of you to ignore the fact that the greatest actual threat to Iran after Saddam has been the Russians. They have tried more times than any other power. They are a much greater threat than Israel. Where do you get your figures for the number of nuclear weapons Israel possesses? More so what does the size of the armed forces have to do with whether or not Iran and Hezbollah are an existential threat? Iran and its proxies are looking long term, building up their power and capabilities to become that threat. In 1933 Germany was no threat to France. It's armed forces were a shadow when Hitler took the Ruhr. Same in 1938 and the Chech crisis. You know what happened in 1940. Iran is looking to the future as they have stated time and time again. Their intent is to erase Israel and Saudi and the Sunni states. Arguing over capability while ignoring intent is foolish.
What claim? I'm talking geopolitical realities. Both Iran, Israel, and us are all making propaganda. Don't believe any of it. In fact, they attacked nuclear reactors. They attack Iraq's reactor twice. It was a power plant built by the French who had their own technicians killed in the attack. Don't swallow Israeli propaganda either. It doesn't matter what excuse they give, the fact is that Israel has made surprise air strikes against five countries with whom they were not at war. Any neighbor of Israel would be foolish to ignore this. The Iranians may be radical, but they are not fools. Nonsense. Iran and Israel have been at odds ever since the fall of Lebanon and Iran began supporting Hezbollah. The same way they did when they attacked Iraq. Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Iraq cannot stop the Israeli Air Force. They have stealth drones, they have tankers but most importantly they have Jericho ICBM's and sumbarine-launched nuclear cruise missiles. Do you ever read the news? http://thinkprogress.org/world/2015...r-talks-near-deal-israel-threatens-bomb-iran/ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...weapons-equipment-intercepted-cargo-ship.html http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/06/06/israel.iran/ http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/0...s-threaten-tactical-strikes-against-iran.html I am providing facts that you can't dispute, except with hollow rhetoric like this. So they claim and you blindly believe. But you can't ignore that countries that have been bombed and threatened by Israel simply do not agree and have no reason at all to trust Israel. You are believing your own propaganda. I've already pointed out plenty of justification for anybody in the region to be suspicious of Israel. No country in the middle east has attack more of their neighbors than Israel. See, you can see reality when you try. This isn't a US-Iranian deal. It is a multi-national coalition and we need to behave like we are part of the team. Our ritual political self-destruction on all matter of foreign policy is killing us. Their nuclear weapons are a credible threat and they are also an enemy of Israel. Where is your outrage over them? Pakistan limits Iranian ambitions in the region and vice versa. They are not on the verge of war, but they very much play into each others strategic ambitions. When each of them is not distracted by worse problems, they will be at odds. Theoretically yes. But in practical terms, the US would not hinder Israel and might even help them, but we would seriously oppose a Russian invasion of the middle east. Putin is still dealing with the fallout from the Crimean annexation and the Russian have not forgotten the disastrous quagmire they got into in Afghanistan. Neither have we. Research. It won't take you long to find it if you actually look. They simply don't have the critical mass, the logistics, or the secure bases to endanger the existence of Israel. If Israel was willing to pay the political price, it could eliminate Hezbollah in a single campaign. But it would take a genocidal effort that Israel is sensitive about getting involved with. The rocket attacks piss off the Israelis as they are designed to do, but it hasn't affected their economy, their military capacity, or the morale of the Israelis. They haven't suffered anything like we did on 9/11 and that attack did not come close to causing our downfall. Of course. So are we and every other country in the middle east. It is the nature of geopolitics. Not at all. Rhetoric means nothing. World domination fantasies mean nothing. Saddam had the same intent. He attacked Israel and invaded Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. What did it get him? Zippo and a early grave. The Iranians are not stupid. They haven't won a war since the 17th century. If they try something, they can be stopped. We don't have to worry about intents when their capabilities are known and defendable. The Saudis want to destroy Iran, but that ain't happening either.
Not going to argue your points again. It's useless to one who is more in favor of winning an argument that having a discussion. Don't bother crowing that you've won because all you've done is cement the facts that you would defend anything HRC, the administration or liberal does. Answer one question why is Chuck Schumer against the deal? Is he so in the pocket of Israel he has no choice? As to Pakistan I was uneasy when they developed the bomb as it put the Indian sub continent on a hair trigger though at least they had some reason since their mortal enemy India had one and war is always simmering on that border. I was outraged when they sold their technology to N Korea and were marketing it to others. I supported the embargoes and penalties they were given. But sport that was 20+ years ago and can't be changed. Unfortunately I fear they will find a ready customer in Saudi Arabia no matter what the Sauds say publicly. They would be fools to put their faith in Obama and Kerry or the U.S. for that matter. That is realpolitik.
Lame cop out. You either make your points or you fail to. We come here to argue politics. And all you do is attack same. Spare me your crocodile tears. Hard to say if he's in their pocket completely, but he is a jew who supports Israel in everything. He is in their pocket on this one. If he splits the party, he can kiss his minority leadership goodbye. True enough, but Pakistan is also a muslim country, heavily anti-Shiite, and a player in Persian Gulf politics as well. Without the treaty Iran will join Pakistan as a nuclear power within a year. Is that what you want instead of no nukes for a decade? What exactly do you want if you oppose this treaty? The Saudis have put their trust in us for 75 years. Fact. Pakistan's renegade nuclear scientist also sold secrets to Iran and Libya, but that was 20 years ago, too. They are much more insular now. Pakistan has the only Islamic bomb and they want to keep it that way.
@red55 You argue as if there is a moral equivalency between Israel, the U.S. as opposed to Iran, Syria, Russia and their like. It seems from your arguments that it's just words and diplomatic play. I grant you sometimes state craft is required and diplomacy with those who are antithical to you. However the worst mistake that can be made is to forget who and what they are. It is my opinion that to defend Iran's position as reasonable and condemn Israel as a danger is wrong. To give moral equivalence to them is wrong. Now tell me if you see a moral equivalence between Israel and Iran or a equal standing to their respective positions ?