The Biden presidency

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Winston1, Dec 29, 2020.

  1. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,706
    Likes Received:
    16,645
    I asked you who he actually nominated on a list. Your link has zero lists... Trump had a list of a few people and it got narrowed down before congress approved. I wasn’t alive in 1980 so you can tell me if this is not how it’s done.

    Nothing in your link gives names of every person that they sent to Congress. This isn’t debatable. Which is why I asked.

    So try again or keep deflecting per usual.

    So yea, if his list of nominations were all women, which they weren’t, as I said, that is sexism. Just like if Biden only has a list of black women, it’s racist and sexist.

    Regardless. Pointing out Regan made a sexist pick doesn’t make Biden’s pick any less sexist or racist.
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2022
  2. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    And I told you I am not doing your home work for you. If you want to know the answer to that question go research it for yourself. Stop being lazy and go learn for yourself. Google is free.

    I don't think you understand how this process works. The President makes a nomination...one person. Not a list. He nominated her. If you have evidence otherwise then present it but stop asking me to do it for you.

    So are you saying that you have evidence otherwise? If so, then let's see it. I suspect that you mean Reagan nominated other individuals to the supreme court during the course of his presidency but when O'Conner was nominated there were no other names presented. She was the nomination.

    The decision is political and nothing else. Was for Reagan and the same is true for Biden. If you have some evidence that says Biden's picks are not qualified then let's hear it.
     
  3. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,706
    Likes Received:
    16,645
    I don’t need evidence. I have a working dictionary.

    I am not allowed to hire based on race. It’s against the law.

    Just like, if what you say is true, Regans pick was sexist.

    It’s not that complicated.
     
  4. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    Was it also sexist when Trump promised to nominate a woman to the Supreme Court? Because when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died he vowed to nominate another woman to the court. I've searched and searched but I can't find the thread you started about it being sexist. In fact, I can't find a single thread from anyone here about it being sexist. That wasn't long ago. Where were you then?
     
  5. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,706
    Likes Received:
    16,645
    Yes. This isn’t complicated.

    I didn’t start a thread about Biden’s racist idea either.

    Does it change the actual facts?
     
  6. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    can you show me where you said it was sexist for Trump to nominate a woman? do you have proof of your position?
     
  7. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,706
    Likes Received:
    16,645
    I didn’t until you asked. Just like I didn’t about Biden until someone asked.

    See how this works?
     
  8. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,706
    Likes Received:
    16,645
    Like I said. All you want to do is score points.

    You don’t really give a shit.

    Trump grabs random womens boxes. Of course he is a sexist bastard. Just like Biden grabs little kids.
     
  9. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    No you didn't. I guess it didn't bother you then. What should we infer from that? You are willing to make a comment about it now but not then. Claiming that you were outraged then and not now just makes you look two faced and disingenuous. Again, I am only using your own words here.
     
  10. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,706
    Likes Received:
    16,645
    What comment did I make? Please be specific and we can avoid confusion.
     

Share This Page