LaSalle, you don't have Green's story straight other than him selling his bowl game jersey. He didn't sit the rest of the year. His suspension was at the beginning of the year and it was for four games. He repaid the $1000 he received for the jersey. The NCAA's issue was with the UNC player who they described as working with/for an agent.
No. If we're going to make assumptions, you'd rather believe something that just isn't the case versus the facts of the matter? These two stories are polar opposites of each other.
How are they even worse? Don't misunderstand me. I think the ruling and rules on AJ's case are one of the areas that need addressed. HaHa's decision to accept the loan was downright stupid. The NCAA has provisions within their bylaws that would have allowed him to get money for the stolen items. Still, both stories are polar opposites. AJ was caught and then repaid the money. HaHa repayed his loan before this season started and it wasn't due to being caught. In the end both will have served their suspensions for stupid decisions.
Is there an actual investigation or is all of this stuff just swirling with no action from the NCAA? I am a bit out of the loop on it and too lazy to read the 22 pages to see if the answer is in this thread.
In the early 1980s Tulane's basketball program received the death nail from the NCAA in part because then head coach Ned Fowler lent Hot Rod Williams $40 to put his family in a motel room the night their trailer burned down. (That and something called point shaving...)
HaHa reinstated by the NCAA today, nothing to see here. http://espn.go.com/college-football...alabama-crimson-tide-safety-ha-ha-clinton-dix
