In the beginning There was Carson. Then Carson and Letterman. Then there was Leno and Letterman. Then there was O'Brien and Letterman for a year then Leno and Letterman again. Now all we have for late night talk shows is puke.
Yet the ultri-right,.. kkk, Nazi, skinheads, and other such extremist groups,.. they're known constituents of Trump. He needs to condemn them continually, not just when he's sorta forced to. If Trump, by talk and action, pushes those evil bastards out of his camp,.. well, I'll respect that. I've read some about antifa,.. it's clear they're violent criminals too,.. they and the white supremacists are all fucking nuts,.. opposite ends of the same idiot stick.
I will be rational responding to this post. I am a little confused as to why you think Trump needs to continually condem neo nazi's. OK if you are right that he needs to do that, although I think that would be foolish for him to do constantly, should the leaders of the democrats such as Schumer and Pelosi be continually condeming Antifa and Black Lives Matter? Also do you see the the slippery slope having to constantly codem hate groups? How often once a day, week, month or year? Let's say Trump does it once a week and he forgets to do it one week what do you think the MSM and the left would accuse him of should that happen? I would also believe that the MSM and the dems would say once a week is not enough or he doesn't mean it. Hell dont you see the pattern with the MSM and the dems? They have been accusing Trump of being a racist for simply wanting to enforce existing immigration laws. They accuse him of "coded" messages to white racists if he mentions his love of America and the flag. You also say neo nazi's, skinheads and the kkk are "known constituents" of Trump. Votered for yes but constiuents I would disagree. Constituents suggest he agrees with their views and thats wrong to suggest. Last question; If you are right doesnt that make Antifa and Black Lives Matter "constituents" of Schumer and Pelosi?
Below are two of Trumps statements last Sunday. Since we all know there were two violent hate groups that showed up armed with bats with malice in their hearts. What is the problem with Trumps response? In addition to Antifa keep in mind that Black Lives Matter was also there. All this does not excuse the neo nazi's repugnant presence but they still have a right to free speech as any other racist groups have. We're closely following the terrible events unfolding in Charlottesville, Virginia," Mr. Trump said. "We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence, on many sides." We agreed that the hate and the division must stop and must stop right now. We have to come together, as Americans, with love for our nation and true affection - really, and I say this so strongly - true affection for each other.
Here is a good read about fascism http://dailysignal.com/2017/08/03/f...mNzVuUENhcDFBdEJla2N5SE0yVkpHUHBtNHFOM005MCJ9
Definition of constituent,.. one of the individual parts of which a composite entity is made up. Blowhard, it's not relevant what you think the word suggests,.. You're trying to twist the word, nitpicking it for argument, but I'll rephrase if you like,.. neo nazi's, skinheads and the kkk are known components of Trump's voting block. You ask,.. how often should President Trump condemn neo-Nazi's and other hate groups,.. I say every fucking chance he gets.
Your non response to my question about Schumer and Pelosi denouncing Antifa and Black Lives Matter speaks volumes about your motives and utter hypocrisy. OK hypocrite blowhard; Antifa, Black Lives Matter, New Black Panthers, La Raza and Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam are "known components" of Schumer and Pelosi's voting block. You ask, how often should Schumer and Pelosi condemn the above groups,.. I say every fucking chance they get. "Duck season!"
