not sure what you mean here. i am pro-choice, just like you. i favor baby murder. perhaps you are referring to the freedom of the baby to not be killed, and in that case you are right. i was disputing the pro-choice contention that a baby isnt a human life until birth, which is absurd. my contention is that human life is not sacred.
Yes you do. I was talking about your contention that "ethics and morals are personal and should not extend to what other people can and cannot do to themselves." Is this principal not universal?
By being pro-choice, martin is extending this same idea. It is pro-life people that try to force their morals on others. I'm not following you.
