Super Bowl played out of country? | Page 3 | TigerFan.com

LSUGradin99 · May 7, 2007

tirk said: ↑

this is rediculous and would greatly demenish my interest.

if i had to go overseas to witness the first saints superbowl, im sure id get throwed out.
Click to expand...

that post is highlarryus tirk! :hihi:

bayareatiger · May 7, 2007

LSUGradin99 said: ↑

that post is highlarryus tirk! :hihi:
Click to expand...

hyuk hyuk hyuk ractically gargling laughter:

BostonBengal · May 8, 2007

qball316 said: ↑

This is a rediculous idea! Football is America's sport, no other country is playing it or either attempting to start it. The Superbowl brings millions of dollars to American cities every year, so why on earth would you give those millions to another country? You don't see the Rugby world championship being played in the US. This is crazy, It is our version of "football", its because of us that it has blown up worldwide, the money and the championship should stay with us!
Click to expand...

Right on!

khounba · May 10, 2007

And so it begins. At least it's not the Super Bowl, yet.

Although talks are extremely preliminary, the NFL is investigating adding a 17th regular-season game and playing it outside the United States. The extra game would take the place of one in the preseason, allowing every team to play once abroad without sacrificing a home match.
Click to expand...

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-17thgame&prov=ap&type=lgns

Bengal Buddy · May 10, 2007

The Super Bowl is an American institution and it should be played here. Imagine the outrage if someone suggested the World Series be played in a foreign country.