Subpoenas target Justice; White House could be next

You seem to be the confused one not I.
I'm consistantly against bad government and renegade administrations like
Bush and Clinton.
It is you and your friends on here that is confused.
I have no problem with wiping out our government in DC and starting from
scratch and I have no problem with showing Bush and Cheney the door for
their issues.

Maybe you and suprafan should learn how to read?
I said impeach the bastards but I only wish the same would've happened to
the previous administration for killing children. etc.
Let me get this straight, you and Suprafan condone the killing of innocent people including children.
It seems to me someone would be confused to be against abortion and turn
the other way for the killing of innocent people including children such as
waco.
Who is being consistant here and who is not?

Suprfan is laughable, he talks morals and gives demo's a free pass.
William Jefferson for starters.

 

William Jefferson isn't history?

 

Sourdough when have I ever defended William Jefferson? What does he have to do with the failings of the Justice Department? He is being investigated. He will probably be indicted, tried, convicted, and go to jail. What does any of that have to do with a discussion involving the poltically motivated firings of 8 US attorneys who wouldn't "play ball?"

If you want to start threads about William Jefferon or Bill Clinton. Don't hi-jack threads that don't relate to those topics.

 

Who are you to tell me what to do?:shock:
Does my money for this forum go to you?:dis:

It is your opinion that I hi jacked this thread.
What I said is that the justice department hasn't changed in the last 14 years
or so what has changed is the spin the last administration had versus this one.
I was nice and answered your question this time!:lol:
I will hijack your threads from now on if you want to be an ass about things!:dis:
I'm hoping otherwise!:thumb:

 

I agree that Gonzales should resign, and that it is wrong to fire an Attorney General for political reasons. However, the democratic congress is demanding explainations because democrates are not involved. If we had a democratic president and a republican congress, it would be the republicans demanding explainations. Politics cannot be ignored.

 

Exactly, that is my problem with the yahoos on here crying foul play!

 

Cause they are bumbling idiots who can't keep their talking points in sync?

Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the Right... Here I am stuck in the middle with myself.

 

I won't argue the W vs Clinton thing because I believe they both have been
terrible presidents in thier own way.

The chart with the colors is nice but are you saying good presidents control
the budget deficit while bad ones don't?
I think there is more to life and the making of a president than that one issue.