Stanford Judge feeling the heat from petitioners

Well that's the thing, they don't attempt to do it. It kinda sneaks up on them. I imagine it's much more common with younger kids who get carried away (no pun) by not knowing how to pace themselves.

 

When those different things include violence, force, or humiliation against the partner's wishes or abilities to give consent, it's not sex....it's sexual assault. 2 different things. You could get drunker than Cooter Brown and I don't believe you would ever rape a female.

 

The prosecution did not believe there was sex. They never alleged it because the charge not rape, it was intent to eventually rape.

You simply are wrong.

 

ME?!?! How in the phuck did ME get into this? We're talking about HIM.

Forcing yourself on me is not funny and mildly offensive - especially if you use the "other" bathroom like I suspect.

 

No, I'm not. But keep saying so if it makes you feel better. California rape laws differ than a lot of other states. Rape charges here have requirements and the prosecution did not have what it needed to make a rape charge stick so they went with what they knew would get a conviction.

 

That's incorrect it was just a bit of fingerblasting,

 

Lots of good sex involves all those things. When you push it past that threshold where its not consent but it is. The whole 50 shades thing has a lot of truth to it. I tried to read it but it was horrible.

But yeah I wouldnt want anything to do with someone if they werent interested. My ego wouldnt allow it.

 

You spoke as though you knew he was "playing around". I merely challenged your definition of playing around.

Right.

 

How fitting in the state that gave us, "If it does not fit, you must aquit."

 

Also, your claim about the victims letter is wrong, she means the fingers, and anyways she only knows what she was told, she has no memory of the event.