Something that sticks in my craw

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by tigerpub, Jan 5, 2015.

  1. COTiger

    COTiger 2010 Bowl Pick 'Em Champ

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    16,784
    Likes Received:
    6,431
    I don't wear silver & blue glasses.
     
  2. mctiger

    mctiger RIP, and thanks for the music Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    26,988
    Likes Received:
    17,168
    OK, based on this link, I'm reversing myself in part. The ball did touch the ground, you can see it in the .gif at the end of the article. However, I still don't think the rule should have even come into play, because in the process of going to the ground, Bryant takes a step after getting both feet down. This, in my mind, should take the "process" rule they applied out of the discussion, because going to the ground is no longer part of the process of the catch.
    http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/laces-...c-playoffs-dez-bryant-catch-overturned-011115
     
  3. tirk

    tirk im the lyrical jessie james

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    47,369
    Likes Received:
    21,536

    Then rule is you have to maintain control once going to the ground. The steps for some reason don't matter


    Not a catch. Shifty rule, right call no matter how bad I want it not to be.
     
  4. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    Still don't see it definitively hit the ground. Could have been his arm. again you can deduce it hit the ground, but here's the thing, 3 steps and a lunge for the endzone isn't a football move? That's ridiculous. Not to mention the ball popped up and back into his hands, if the ball hit the ground which it may have, I'm just saying its not visible like the the Randall Cobb play is, his arm is still around it, then it pops up into his hands.

    My argument is that if this wasn't a catch the play in the fist half damn sure wasn't a catch. What's happened here is officials have been put in a position to where now they determine outcomes of games instead of players, unless they are consistent, much like an umpire with no strike zone.
     

Share This Page