You know it's funny. I could say it's sad that you keep starting those threads, with the outcome becoming more and more predictable...and how sad that is. But it's not. It's just funny. - FWIW, I don't think for a minute your threads cause a dam thing to take place, except good conversation. I like your threads.
Mind blowing why we didn't put 7 in prevent defense? That play cost us a chance to play in a BCS game.
I agree. But still cannot comprehend why we let a color blind guy play safety. He demolished Claiborne. Had he hit the right guy, end of half...and probably end of game for the receiver. Instead, our other safety is the one he knocks out the game.
One of many things. That wasn't nearly the only thing that went bad for the Tigers, but it was a big one.
Claiborne is a CB. See even armchair QB's make mistakes. You are right though that falls more on the player than the play call. The defense was in position to make the play and failed.
It's almost worth losing PP if Cam and Mallet go pro. And whoever said it above is correct - even if you think he'll take a knee, a prevent should have been called for D
Yeah, my bad. And now that you put it that way, had safety Hatcher not even been in position, CB Claiborne was about to tackle the WR. But safety Hatcher WAS in position...to knock CB Claiborne TFO. Still should have had two people at the goal line.
