it hardly deserves an explanation, but basically women are SLOWER than men women are SHORTER than men men are QUICKER than women men can JUMP i don't even think the women would get off a decent shot
Shooting with a ball that is smaller would make it a little easier. But as Mobile said, the men wouldn't have to shoot better to win. On a side note, I think it's funny we're debating women vs men's basketball to talk about anything but Nick Saban....
i think this is another example of how urban legends get started. i think i saw a report on tv about this and the guys they used were just regular students, smallish white guys if i remember correctly. i am not positive, but i think i will go ahead and call BS on this.
in fact, i bet we could assemble a team of guys from tigerforums that could beat the lsu women with enough practice.
I knew that comment would get you chauvinistic pigs rilled up. I don;t think the LSU women could beat the men, but they could beat some other college men's teams. slippery rock, maybe?
absolutely not. pay attention now. in the history of women's basketball, nobody had ever dunked until a few years ago. NOBODY. think that over. the women could not beat any real men's college team. not in a thousand tries. the worst school in the SEC right now would absolutely destroy a dream team of all the greatest women in history, in their primes. the men would be able to dunk anytime they wanted. i dunno why people say such stupid things. imagine mike tyson had a sister who was a boxer. mike tyson is not in the best time of his career. it would be incredibly stupid to say his sister could beat him up, but people say stupid things like that anyways. like you just did.