See, here's the problem. Creationism has no evidence. It only has faith which is nothing more than someone forming a point of view without evidence. Growing up, we call this a "fairy tale". I have no problem with people following creationism. It's when they try to pass it off as "science" that I have no patience for...
I'm not like the official spokesman for creationism so there are probably much better arguments than I am making but I can't believe there haven't been some experiments or findings that support the creationist point of view. I mean, do you really think they are just saying, "no, that's wrong" without making any kind of case for themselves? Every side at least makes a case....
That is exactly the problem with creationism. It is solely based on the errant belief that the Bible is to be interpreted literally and that Genesis is an actual accounting of precisely how creation went down.
I think you're wrong on that one, I certainly don't believe in the Bible literally. The Catholic Church doesn't believe in the Bible literally. There is a lot of symbolism in the Bible.
i said you are saying things that are so stupid you should feel embarrassment, not sure what you mean about free speech.
Didn't you say the same thing about global warming? We all have seen how that one has had the books cooked. As a Native American, I think that you speak with forked tongue as often as not.
Red, I ask you are these accusations in fact true or do you dismiss them as well: http://www.conservapedia.com/Theory_of_Evolution_and_Cases_of_Fraud,_Hoaxes_and_Speculation or watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hV-rqCDhew (not being a jerk, Red...just figure you are in a better position to verify these cases of Fraud, etc.)