Shall we talk about Hillary's emails?

Read the document. You have just proven to me, again, that when presented with facts, you ignore them anyway.

 

I read the document, dipshit. Name the page and quote the wording. You're a liar, and you're about to carry the same consequences with me as does jmg. You're dishonest, and your posts are not worthy of my attention any longer. It would be a simple thing to admit "I was mistaken". But you double down on easily disprovable nonsense, which turns your mistake into a big lie. That's a no-no.

 

You lack a fundamental understanding of the document and are out of your element. I cannot help you any further.

 

yes, i noted this on the list of rhetorical devices you use. along with calling people racist, imagining hypocrisy, saying "lol" for no reason, you enjoy withdrawing when faced with rational argument.

 

And not even the three emails had true classified markings WITHIN them, either. See above post.

 

Markings don’t make something classified. The content does.

Just like a dress doesn’t make you a woman. You need a vagina and a uterus. .

 

In the case of documents and emails: Wrong.

classified; (of information or documents) designated as officially secret and to which only authorized people may have access:

If there's no designation there's no classification. Can an unclassified email have classified information within it? Sure... it can have bits of information that was classified elsewhere. But that information is difficult to identify as classified information unless the communication, itself, is properly marked, especially in their headers.

 

Do you have an authority on that? Because I’d like to see it. No sarcasm here

 

CARTWRIGHT: If you're going to classify something, there has to be a header on the document, right?
COMEY: Correct.