I still don't understand what the big deal about page 14 is and why liberal pundits are jacking off over their waffles about it. So what "Movant is amenable to certain conditions proposed by the Government" which includes the 3rd party having top secret security clearance. That is neither here nor there in an admission of anything.
That is because they think a security clearance is the same as secret information. They are dumb. a security clearance is a clearance, with levels, that signify trust. That’s it. The deeper you go, the more the government has inspected your entire life, finances, sexual partners, foreign ties, potential conflicts of interest, etc. It’s like the markings deal. They can’t grasp the concepts.
The leftist don't understand any of this because they have not lived it like several of us have. They don't understand the "need to know" concept.
Right. For example, here in Dallas, you need a secret clearance to work at the Nuke energy plant. Not because you are dealing with government secrets, but because they require that level of background check on you. Hell, there are many private sector jobs that require "secret" clearances...
That's a nonsense statement. Nobody gave you the notion that security clearance = secret information. That's just nonsense you formulated as a distraction from yourself being made an obvious fool here. Now, let's hear your creative rebuttal to the following sentence: Inspections of top secret/SCI documents require a security clearance. Then let's hear your imaginative rebuttal to the following sentence: If the Mar-a-Lago documents were in fact declassified no security clearance would be legally necessary to inspect them. Then back up your claim that the trump filing yesterday specifically claimed that the documents in question were declassified. Page number, wording. I gave you the link. You thought you could just throw shit against the wall and get away with it.
You did. That is why you are trying to draw a correlation. Correct Because in the link you gave me, here: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.58.0_4.pdf Trumps lawyers state among the declassified information taken, they also took documents Trump claimed executive privilege over among attorney client information. You can find more information about executive privilege here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/constit...ction-2/clause-3/executive-privilege-overview In other-words, documents with claimed executive privilege is "another" form of classification specific to the office of the president requiring special authority.
1) trump does not have "executive privilege". 2) inspection of executive privileged documents does not require top secret security clearances, anyway. You're just flinging shit around like a cornered monkey who has shit himself. Now, why did you ignore the last part of my post? Back up your claim that the trump filing yesterday specifically claimed that the documents in question were declassified. Page number, wording. I gave you the link to the filing.
