No, he didn't say they were properly ID'd as classified. Just because a few emails might contain some classified information doesn't mean the emails were properly ID'd. The emails were not id'd as classified in their headers. Just as Comey admitted, the absence of that info in a header would immediately tell an expert in the handling of classified materials that those documents were not classified. You lose. But let's not lose sight of the big takeaway: nothing Hillary did was criminal or obstructive. Can't say the same for trump's possession and concealment of documents at Mar-a-Lago I'm repeating myself here and getting bored with the topic. Time to move on.
That isnt what he said. He said this specifically: But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
but she was doing the same thing, possessing secret docs, except on a network computer where they were more vulnerable, and also she didnt have the power to declassify
That doesn't mean the emails were classified. He said it's a reasonable inference for an expert in the handling of classified documents to conclude that emails were NOT classified if it's not marked as such in their headers.
He said they were classified at the time sent/received. You are wrong. As always. Again, you are taking a sound bite from a hearing in which they were talking about just 3 of the emails Comey found. You are a liar.
For the umpteenth time, he does not say the emails were classified. "Contained classified information" doesn't mean the emails were classified. In fact, Comey doesn't say that those emails had classified markings within them, either. So, we're talking about three emails only that were marked... but those were marked with little C's within the documents, not in their headers. And as he testified, an expert in the handing of classified information would have been justified in concluding they're not classified if they were not identified as such in their headers.
My apologies. I didn't know I was trying to communicate with someone who is as mentally defunct such as yourself. I don't think you could grasp that the emails "Should have been marked" thus rules were broken; as Comey said... ( in fact he states the opposite of what you said "justified in concluding they're not classified if they were not identified as such in their headers.) But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it. While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government. The same rules you are shitting in your pants over for Trump. If there is classified information in an email, document, folder, its classified material. Unless you are Trump and declassify it with a wave of your hand. So you are now left with 2 options. HRC was a complete moron and didn't know how to handle or interpret classified information, plausible, or she lied because the info was classified and her or someone on her team removed the markings, as Comey stated.
It's not the same rules with trump. trump's documents, as we can clearly see in the photograph, are CLEARLY marked as classified. You lose. Again and again.
No moron he doesn't. Classified information in an email that isn't marked doesn't make it any less Classified! Instead it becomes an issue for whomever put it there or transmitted it without the proper markings. Trump can have whatever he wants as he is the Supreme Authority! If he says "this is declassified" then it is. End of story! You are an idiot
