Let me help you. From Comey's mouth: From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-rele...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
From the hearing, itself: Rep. Matthew Cartwright: Those three documents with the little “c”s on them, were they properly documented? Were they properly marked according to the manual? Director Comey: No. Rep. Cartwright: According to the manual, and I ask unanimous consent to enter this into the record, Mr. Chairman. According to the manual, if you’re going to classify something, there has to be a header on the document, right? Director Comey: Correct. Rep. Cartwright: Was there a header on the three documents that we’ve discussed today that had the little “c” in the text someplace? Director Comey: No, there were three e-mails. The “c” was in the body in the text, but there was no header on the email or in the text. Rep. Cartwright: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what's classified and what’s not classified and we're following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that? Director Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
Have you deduced the line of question was with regards to only "3" specific emails? My statement above clearly shows what Comey found with regards to 30K worth. Or, you would agree then, that the FBI and Comey are liars. Which path should we go?
lying again, she was handling top secret documents. and yet you cant answer why! why did she need to have these documents? is it because she owes money to russia?
"110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received" does not mean that the emails, themselves, were classified. I repeat: Rep. Cartwright: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what's classified and what’s not classified and we're following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that? Director Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
Comey found ZERO emails that were in fact classified. Other government agencies, who themselves would have been authorized to have "classified information", reported 110 emails that contained "classified information", not that the emails/documents themselves were classified.
so now you changed your story to indicate she had classified documents but the handling of them was so sloppy she didnt even know they were classified. utter incompetence on the part of her administration. remember, just minutes ago, you lied: "But there weren't any classified documents"
You are lying by taking two statements made from two different times. The 1st Comey was giving a report. The second, it was a hearing and specific question was asked about 3 specific emails.
to be clear, your claim here is that the emails had classified info in them, but the info was also not classified. like shroedingers secrets. it was classified and not classified at the same time.
