Shall we talk about Hillary's emails?

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Rex, Aug 30, 2022.

  1. BAY0U BENGAL

    BAY0U BENGAL I'm a Chinese Bandit

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    6,097
    Likes Received:
    2,454
    I saw that. But I mean the written authority. Isn’t there a DOJ policy I could read? I don’t mind searching, I just don’t really know what search terms or where to start
     
  2. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,690
    Likes Received:
    16,629
    You don’t know anything. Sorry bud.
     
  3. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,690
    Likes Received:
    16,629
    All you are proving is that HRC and her team illegally removed markings, as Comey confirmed.
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2022
    shane0911 likes this.
  4. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    766
    Instead of just admitting you got embarrassed badly here you're just making up further shit.
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2022
  5. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,690
    Likes Received:
    16,629
    Nah, Comey said that over the 110 classified emails he found, HRC and company removed all the markings but 3.
     
    Winston1 likes this.
  6. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    766
    He didn't say that, liar. Didn't even insinuate it.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2022
  7. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,690
    Likes Received:
    16,629
    You lie like Biden.


    From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification.

    https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-rele...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
     
    Winston1 likes this.
  8. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    766
    Everybody here can see that that does not say that Hillary and her team removed markings, liar. You are embarrassing yourself.
     
  9. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,690
    Likes Received:
    16,629
    They are the ones that sent and received it. So they are the ones that must have removed the markings. Which is illegal.
     
    Winston1 and shane0911 like this.
  10. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    766
    You're just assuming what you wish to prove, you circular jackass. Those emails were not classified so there were no classified markings to remove. An email can come from any place, and when we're talking about 30000 emails it's very understandable that some bit of classified info would get unintentionally mentioned every now and then within unclassified documents. In this case, less than 1/3rd of one percent. Want to hear a REAL expert in classification explaining this?

    You're embarrassing yourself.
     

Share This Page