SCIENTIST takes strong stand against those who blindly accept harmful AGW caused by CO2

It's not how I might have worded it, but it is accurate.

 

Completely accurate and totally irrelevant.

 

Why guess? Here is the whole statement so that you can see it in context. It is less than 13 pages, so your attention span should not be an issue. Remember these are physicists, not climatologists, so they are thinking in terms of physics.

" . . . without mitigating actions significant disruptions in the Earth's physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and health are likely. Such predicted disruptions are based on direct measurements (e.g., ocean acidification, rising sea levels, etc.), on the study of past climate change phenomena, and on climate models. Climate models calculate the effects of natural and anthropogenic changes on the ecosphere, such as doubling of the CO2-equivalent concentration relative to its pre-industrial value by the year 2100."

I can't answer for someone else's writing. What the statement says is . . .

"Thus given the significant risks associated with global climate change, prudent steps should be taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions now while continuing to improve the observational data and the model predictions."

 

Sad, but probably true, prayer might be our best hope.

Investigate the importance, and study the consequences of altering thermohaline circulation.

In the earths past minor alterations have resulted in mini-ice ages of 5,000 years or so. Major disruptions have occured, As when plate techtonics closed the deep current's path through the isthmus of central america. The earth turned into an ice ball for hundreds of thousands of years, and it wasn't the only time.

I've heard that the deep current cycles every 1800 years, and it takes several cycles to regain it's equilibrium. Untill the balance is restored the weather becomes increasingly "unusual" and violent.

It's not even important how it became altered, if it has we're f*cked. There is a lot of evidence, a ton of evidence that suggests changes.

Doubtfull, anyone alive will see any major obvious differences, the consequences are down the road.

Doesn't matter if people bury their heads in the sand.

 

Pollution and environmental concerns ARE relative to the earth's future.