Oh, so Bush has made America the policeman of the world, has he? Is that why he invaded Iraq? Ok, so when does Bush invade and take over The Sudan, where over 2 million of its citizens have been murdered by their own government in the last twenty years? When does Bush invade a dozen other African countries that brutalize and murder their own citizens? Don't bother to answer, because we all know that Bush and his right wing wackos do not care one iota about the welfare of a bunch of Arabs. Anyway, Bush invaded because he said Saddam was planning a nuclear attack on the United States, at least that is what he told us. So stop lying. You right wing nuts will tell any lie to defend Bush. You are just a bunch of right wing robots, and you accept anything Bush says, no matter how much different today's story is from yesterday's story. You Rush Limbaugh boot lickers just take orders, click your heals, and say, "Hail Bush." You can't think for yourself, so stop trying to get into a discussion you don't know crap about.
And it has been demonstrated that nothing intelligient can come from your ignorance, hasn't it G-man? What pisses you guys off, is that you cannot defend the reasons Bush went to war. You don't care if he had any reasons, you just line up behind him, bend over and get your orders, and then support anything Bush says. But you cannot defend him with any facts.
And Bush made Iraq a financial playground for Halliburton, Bechtel and other companies that gave massive amounts of money to the Republican Party. I wonder how our soldiers feel about dying for Halliburton's bottom line?
G-man, Bush could murder Laura on the steps of the White House a month before the election and little right wing robots like you would defend him. You have no credibility and nothing to say. You cannot defend the war, so you don't even try. Which is smart, because you would just appear to be a bigger dufus than you do now.
1. If the likes of YOU thinks I'm ignorant, that must mean I'm doing something right, so I'll just take that as a compliment. 2. We didn't GO TO WAR. This is something that most people fail to understand. Saddam broke the cease-fire by refusing to comply with U.N. resolutions. If the U.N. as a body didn't have the backbone to ENFORCE said resolutions, then it was up to US to do so, in order to maintain the U.N.'s so-called "viability". Ask Bill Clinton if Saddam had WMD...or the Democrats in Congress who voted to back the use of force last October.
cbowl, i laid out the reasons we went to war for you on another thread but you didnt listen. you just call conservatives liars over and over, and dont listen. thats not very nice.
CottonBowl66, Can you PROVE that President Bush LIED? Do you PERSONALLY have incontrovertible evidence that he INTENTIONALLY MISLED the American people? Or do you only have shrill left-wing panic over the fact that your party has been imploding for the last 5 years, and the best that they can muster against Mr. Bush is 9 morons with ABSOLUTELY NO PLATFORM TO RUN ON? Saddam has been captured. The economy is gaining strength daily. If I were in your shoes I guess I'd be panicking right now, too.
Well, I rest my case. You right wing liars will put any spin on any lie to justify Bush's war. Now we see that Saddam attacked first. What a liar you are G-man. As for you martin, I answered you and told you why you are full of crap. You are just too brain washed to listen. You post "justifying" the war is bogus and worthless. The UN did NOT support the war. End of story.
This is something else that the left is good at...putting words in people's mouths. Point out to me EXACTLY where I said that Saddam attacked first. Go ahead...point it out. If you were intellectually honest, you'd understand that I said that Saddam VIOLATED THE CEASE-FIRE AGREEMENT BY REFUSING TO COMPLY WITH U.N. RESOLUTIONS. But you're NOT intellectually honest, so so much for that. In addition, you seem to have a screw loose, thus I refuse to respond to you any further. Seek professional help.
