kind of sounds like a politician to me, but he is among the 30 or so % of people who favored the war criminal, liar, terrorist, and traitor, George W. Bush, so what do you expect, a donkey as his sig picture?
I don't have a sig picture. You tell me that Bush is a war criminal, liar, terrorist and traitor yet think my sig is a stretch? Please wigga. Note: It appears all of the libs have checked in.
Neither the far left robots nor the far right robots deal in whole truths and the sheeple that follow them down the koolaid by the gallons.
the sig picture comment was a quip. Wigga? Glad to see you showing your true colors again. Bush: War Criminal: allowing and advocating torture during a war, forbidden by the Geneva Convention. Liar: having his cabinet produce false information, and then lying to congress and the American people about wmd's and Iraq's affiliation with Al Queda. Terrorist: starting a war that led to the murder and destruction of thousands of innocent Iraqi children, women, and men. Traitor: even his own dad said that people who out CIA operatives are traitors, his cabinet was directly involved with Robert Novak (rest in piss) outing Valerie Plame, not to mention the hundreds of American servicemen dead, families ruined, children orphaned by his policy and stregthening of the military industrial machine, and executive expansion of an orwellian government. As far as being liberal, socially yes i am liberal. It amazes me how you defend everything this douchebag ever did, i knew that humans started to slip the older they got, but i had no idea. It's cool though, i have some family members that are completely blind also, and were a part of that 30% or so that approved Dubya.
well if that doesn't work for you try this one..... Pelosi contradicts herself on oil issue Published: 8/2/2008 12:05 AMFunny how Madame Pelosi thinks that President Bush releasing the 700 million barrels of oil in the strategic oil reserve to the market would suddenly ease the price at the pump, but that any additional drilling for our own oil, which amounts to billions of barrels in proven reserves, could not possibly help the American consumer. So much for looking out for us. I am disgusted with this Congress. Chuck Guy Elk Grove Village
As much as I don't like Pelosi, when you think about what she said, it the immediate future she was correct. Allowing us to drill wouldn't effect the supply of oil immediately and therefore wouldn't really change the price of oil that much currently (a year ago in this case). Releasing more supply however would have the possibility of changing the price if enough of the supply was released into the system. Believe it or not, she actually knows what she is talking about once in a blue moon. I happened to believe both courses of action were/are needed. We needed to release some of the reserve to ease the price (even though there really wasn't a supply problem to begin with, just speculators running up the price) and we need to allow the drilling offshore. And that's all i will say about that for fear of hijacking and getting into another oil debate with you guys.
Every single one of them knew what they were getting into, otherwise they wouldn't have served. I hate when people try to make their sacrifice an issue during topics such as this.
Yeah my buddy Roy told me before he signed up, man i really hope i get 3rd degree burns from head to toe, maiming me for life, killing all the friends i am going to make in my Hummer with a road side mine, and preventing my new wife and i from ever having kids, i really want people to look at me funny everywhere i go, but what i really want is my president to come up with some stupid story, and lie to everyone so we can invade a country for no reason so this stuff can happen, that would be great. My friends didn't sign up to fight bullsh!t, unprovoked wars, they signed up to defend this nation.
Actually, statements like this from pelosi happened within 6 months of the war in Iraq and not just 5 years before. SabanFan is spot on in charachterizing Pelosi as speaking out of both sides of her mouth. Lets look at the evidence as late as 2002. Then she does a really nice side step changing the subject on this reporter when he asks her about that statement. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyB_ldDMmFE[/media] I find it ironically sad that anyone would try to defend Pelosi on whats in SabanFans sig. :dis:
First of all, I'm terribly sorry about what happened to your friend. But personally, I think that line of thinking is crap. You volunteer to serve in the military, you go where you are told whether you like it or not and you take the risk of what may happen to you. If you're not willing to risk it, you shouldn't join, plain and simple. And before you say nobody signed up for these wars, take a look at the statistics and see how many joined AFTER we invaded Iraq. Anybody who volunteered to serve after 2003 and DIDN'T expect to go to war was living in a fantasy world. And for what it's worth, my good friend Nate didn't think he'd get blown up by an IED, but he knew full well the risk and potential sacrifice he'd have to make by serving and spoke proudly of it.
