Susan Rice? Believable? You mean the same Susan Rice who gave 5 interviews blaming a youtube video for Benghazi? That Susan Rice? The same one who was directed by the WH to promote a false explanation for Benghazi via an email that was initially left out of the investigation but was discovered under FOIA? " documents obtained in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by Judicial Watch revealed that Rice was given a “prep call” beforehand, and the goals of how the situation should be talked about were addressed in an email from senior White House adviser Ben Rhodes. To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy. To reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton told Fox News that the documents seemed more like “a PR strategy” than a relaying of the “best available intelligence”: “The goal of the White House was to do one thing primarily, which was to make the president look good. Blame it on the video and not [the] president's policies.” It's important to note that Republicans had requested the emails pertaining to the “talking points” which Obama administration officials were given for the Benghazi situation. The aforementioned Rhodes email was not included in the 100 emails handed over by the Obama administration. It only came to light because of the FOIA request from Judicial Watch." So now we are all supposed to believe one facking word out of this proven liar's mouth? No thanks. As for Flynn's being fired for being a p.i.t.a.? I'll take Flynn any day over Obama and Trump. He has and always has had this country's best interests at heart. There isn't much of a place for an honest man or woman in DC. Flynn needs immunity because he could tell a shitload of secrets about what we do, why, and who orders it. "I asked the DNI [Gen. James Clapper] if my leadership of the agency was in question and he said it was not; had it been, he said, they would have relieved me on the spot,” Michael Flynn said. “I would not change a lick how I operate. Our country has too much at stake.” The veteran military officer went on to say he was trying to “change the culture” of the Defense Intelligence Agency from an entity which he felt focused far too much on what was going on in Washington, D.C. and spent too little time engaging with forward-based commanders and fighters.....I knew then it had more to do with the stand I took on radical Islamism and the expansion of al Qaida and its associated movements,” Flynn also said. “I felt the intel system was way too politicized, especially in the Defense Department."
true they don't have have top clearance, but they are on the House Intelligence Committee that's investigating this shit, they are privy to classified information,.. and it's a 100% fact that they know more about this than you,.. and yet you spout unequivocally, " there is absolutely nothing there",.. like a buffoon.
So when the republicans said HRC was going to jail what happened? Give me a fucking break. You socialist pigs were so fired up over the DNC hack you gave zero fucks about the content of the hacks and just got pissed at Russia. Your party, just like the GOP, is full of fucking liars and you "choose" to believe these shit stains because it fits your narrative. Don't get it twisted. I have maintained from the beginning my support of Trump was to bring the entire thing to heel. The only buffoon are you loons thinking the Dems going after this because they care about YOU. Trump isn't apart of this system. A system that "looks" like two parties. They all jerk each other off behind closed doors. He will be destroyed, but he is taking the Dems and GOP with him.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortn...asnt-politicalwhy-wasnt-fbi-involved-n2309142 Rand is right. Only because it fits my argument. Understand: There would have been no intelligence need for Susan Rice to ask for identities to be unmasked. If there had been a real need to reveal the identities — an intelligence need based on American interests — the unmasking would have been done by the investigating agencies. The national-security adviser is not an investigator. She is a White House staffer. The president’s staff is a consumer of intelligence, not a generator or collector of it. If Susan Rice was unmasking Americans, it was not to fulfill an intelligence need based on American interests; it was to fulfill a political desire based on Democratic-party interests.
so just revel in the destruction, and quit arguing,.. and the Dem's aren't my party no more,.. I've said repeatedly here, that the Republicans and Democrats are opposite sides of the same coin, controlled by the same evil, and that there will be no significant change/improvement in Washington until a moderate 3rd party rises to power. but Trump's not the answer, he's diseased, he is part of the system and worse, we don't need him, we need the cure.
Then your angst for there to be fire here is misplaced. You think HRC losing is the nail in the Dems? Nope. Trump must push forward. DO you know how many GOPers would have folded already under these allegations? I tell you, the smoke is coming from political operatives.
again with the speculation I don't think burning down the house is the best way to fix it. Trump's fucked in the head, he's dangerous and probably rotten. We need a great leader, not him,.. at some point a true patriot will rise up and create a 3rd party that puts America's best interests ahead of all else. That will be our next great American moment.
