Russian issues

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LSUpride123, Mar 3, 2017.

  1. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,743
    Likes Received:
    23,921
    While I agree 100% the elephant in the room is just what in the blue hell do you propose we do about it?
    I'm not arguing with you here, it is easy to say the "we are their bosses" stuff but are we?

    While the mountain is steep, it is not insurmountable but when you factor in that not nearly enough people in the country really give a shit, well then yeah, it becomes an even tougher obstacle.

    Short of something really drastic this isn't going to be fixed in our lifetime and that is sad, very sad.
     
    GiantDuckFan and HalloweenRun like this.
  2. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    Fascinating how you try to white wash this @Tiger in NC Rice lied about the unmasking and there is no doubt it was released for pure political purposes. As has been noted many times why haven't the democrats names been unmasked when there is much direct evidence that they were in contact. Why do you assume the worst about every Trump or Republican story yet white wash every democrat story?
    Let the scales fall from your eyes. Here I've been blasting Trump and his minions for their Russian contacts yet I'm on the ledge about a story verified by MSNBC concerning democrats dirty play.
    BTW your last question is as stupid as they come. Even an absolutely innocent person knows that any police investigation is a mine field and most lawyers worth their salt advise clients to stay away. Grow up I'm disappointed in you but maybe shouldn't be surprised.
     
    Bengal B likes this.
  3. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    The content of those calls is part of an ongoing FBI investigation, not to mention part of congressional investigations as well so they are not going to release the content. Why would they? That's sensitive information and is likely highly classified.

    Why? Because you and Chester Cheetoh say so?

    It is part of her job to make requests for the authoring agencies to unmask the names. And thanks for helping to prove my point.....Rice couldn't have simply unmasked those names all by herself even if she wanted to. There is a very specific protocol to doing so and she followed it to the letter and left a paper trail to show that she followed the appropriate channels.
     
  4. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    Politicians meet with foreign ambassadors and dignitaries all the time, Pride. The difference is that your boys lied about their meetings and have done everything in their power to obfuscate their meetings with these officials. Why?

    From the Trump team and Breitbart.
     
  5. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    I've already explained that unmasking isn't done by one person in a dark room. If they were unmasked it was because they were continually speaking with people who were under surveillance. Their identity would have been completely hidden until they were unmasked so Rice or any other Obama official would have no way of knowing that they were reading the transcripts from phone calls between the Trump team and the Russians, only that they were monitoring the conversations of someone and the Russians. If they requested for the names to be unmasked it had to go through the approval of several agencies to do so, which we have a paper trail documenting. So essentially you are saying that after going through all of this process and other agencies agreeing that the names should be unmasked because of the nature of their conversations, that the bad guys here are the ones who found out that something nefarious was going on. That's absolutely fucking crazy and there is no other way to spin it. That isn't surveillance, which by the way started out as an accusation of Obama "wire tapping," That is called BUSTED.
     
    GiantDuckFan likes this.
  6. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    Trump is President, no one is questioning that. How much longer he will be President remains to be seen.
     
  7. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/16/trump-claims--falsely--that-clinton-gave-russia-20-of-us-uranium.html

    Just keep believing the fake news, Shane. Nine other government agencies had to sign off on that deal to make it happen.....

    "However, Clinton did not represent the State Department on the panel of agency officials who approve deals such as the Uranium One transaction. The representative at the time, former Assistant Secretary Jose Fernandez, told the Times, "Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on any C.F.I.U.S. matter," referring to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States."
     
  8. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,532
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    I haven't white washed shit Winston. You made an absurd assertion based solely on the word of Donald Trump. The major news agencies have acknowledged the accusation but they are hardly pushing the story as fact. In truth, the story, like every other Trump obfuscation, has been widely debunked.

    Bull Shit. You have absolutely not one shred of evidence to support this assertion other than the word of Donald J Trump. Not one.

    ask the FBI that question. you tell me.....why is the FBI investigating the Trump connections but not any supposed Democrat's connection? Why didn't they investigate Colin Powell's private e-mail server? Because all of the accusations that the Trump people have made about supposed Democrat's contact with Russians are bull shit and are nothing more than an attempt to deflect and take the heat off of themselves.

    Again, this story has never been verified by anyone. The major news agencies have acknowledged the accusation but that is a long way from validation, which they have offered none.

    So now your are suspicious of the police? Now you want to point the finger at the police and say they are the problem? Which is it, Winston? Are the democrats to blame for Trump and his cronies breaking the law or is the FBI? Or maybe it was Dorothy Gail from Kansas who made them collude with the Russians.

    Fuck you, Winston. You like to paint yourself as this reasonable, fact-based person but you are an emotional tool just like the rest of them. You heard a story yesterday and jumped all over it and when I called you on it and showed you what a dumb ass post you made, you now want to call me names and tell me your disappointed like I give a shit.
     
  9. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,700
    Likes Received:
    16,641
    The Irony.
     
    Winston1 likes this.
  10. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,700
    Likes Received:
    16,641
    Speaking of evidence, where is yours? In fact, where is the Russian Hacking evidence? Its nowhere to be found.

    Odd yes?

    Are you an expert?

    Further, it isnt even about the unmasking as it is the leaks.

    1st she said she said she didn't unmasked it. Then she admits she did. Now she says she didn't leak it.

    She is a liar.

    It was leaked for political reasons. Its going to be glorious when she has to tell us who ordered it.
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2017

Share This Page