you can do better than that......pussy is so unoriginal and I'm sure it offends @uscvball's sensibilities like @LaSalleAve using the C word recently
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/03/senate-russia-election-meddling-669405 https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/11/poli...-trump-white-house-russia-meddling/index.html http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...elligence-organizations-or-four-either-way-r/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps...ties-in-the-2016-election/2153/?noredirect=on the last one actually contains the government report issued by the intel community, brother.
knee slapper! you also never told me who this "Deep State" is. Who are they and when did they form? Where do they meet? Who is their leader? You seem so sure that this group exists.....I'd like to know more about them. Not answering anymore of your remedial questions until you answer this one.
I’ve explained it before. But I can go slower this time. Let me know when you take your meds. I can happily educate you.
I'll read the last one only then. I'll post again after I review. If it actually provides evidence as you say. We can star there. You might as well trash the others because as you have said, they contain nothing.
No you haven't. You've never answered me. Who is the Deep State? Who is their leader? How did they form and how long have they been in existence? Not answering anything else until you can answer these.
LOL this report? Old news and nothing it. Like literally NOTHING in it. This was the same report I criticized about lack of Information as compared to the China hacking investigation which cited evidence.
All of them provide an insight or differing angle that have verified the findings of the intel community. The Senate Intel Committee is led by Republicans by the way.
Yes and where are the findings published? Here is an answer, NO WHERE.... You are literally just taking peoples word for it. The same people that found "weapons of mass destruction".
